^ You and Kirby got Swept, no if and buts about it
![]()
You guys are the one making up your own rules. "Lakers rang in 2010 but Kobe doesn't have 5", or "Duncan 4>Kobe 5 because of FMVP", or whatever bull you have to spew.
We're just doing this based on fact:
Kobe 5
Duncan 4
And there ain't a damn thing you can do about that.
^ You and Kirby got Swept, no if and buts about it
![]()
^ How many times do I have to tell you that the sweep had no effect based on the fact that you couldn't capitalize on the le![]()
.........
....
.......
....
..
.......
....
..
,,
.....
![]()
there are 4 guests browsing this forum. Welcome to spurstalk. this is typical around here
The le is none of your business. We ended your le with a Sweep. That's it and that's all. crofl
^ It's our business because we're the ones owning up to the 5-4 shtick, and 6 is what should've put that shtick to rest, but it didn't because Timmy couldn't finish!![]()
All Spurfan can do is talk about how much better their Spurs were than the Lakers in the 2012-13 season. Guess what s? It's just ONE season. When it's all said and done, Kobe has the 5-4 edge over Timmy. 20 years from now the consensus is Kobe>Duncan. Your game 6 performance could've changed that, but it didn't!
How many did you actually witness? I bet only 2 from 09 and 10, you were still in preschool during the Shaq days.
^ None of your business, Cully. You chicken ted after the Sweep, and you own it. We ended it for you.![]()
0-for-13!
The Spurs were good enough to Sweep your sorry ass $130m sandwich. Until further notice, that's how it is.
I already told you, I'm a 5-time World Champion.
it's 3:21 am. What am i becoming. I need to get sleep. I can do this some other time.
Sure. 0-for-4 worked though. lol swept
![]()
^ You can say whatever you want Lakerfan, what we know is The Sweep cut deep and ended your sorry ass season![]()
^ 4-timer
^ Swept
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)