Because this isn't ing TV, flo. Grow the up.
I don't understand why we can't send James Bond type of hit man over there to take out Kim. There is no need for war when the little fat guy over there is the main problem.
Because this isn't ing TV, flo. Grow the up.
https://twitter.com/SPIEGELDAILY/sta...59334323499013
but Trash carries a "small stick"
Why not? Trump is treating this like a reality TV show and he is the President.
I obviously was joking calm down.
Me too, flo.
Seth Meyers takes A Closer Look
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6nU4kfVZMAY
"Why did it start this week?
The reason it appears to have started this week is because of this article from The Washington Post from Tuesday.
That article described a confidential assessment by one U.S. intelligence agency, which reportedly concluded that North Korea had miniaturized a nuclear device and could now fit one onto a missile.
That Washington Post report came out on Tuesday.
Since then, the president has been making these incredibly over-the-top, bellicose, alliterative, overt threats against North Korea.
… These last three days of, literally, nuclear brinksmanship, as far as we can tell, the proximate cause of this – what set it all off – was one newspaper report of a single agency’s reported conclusion,
which has not been bolstered by other sources, that doesn’t reflect any sort of formal, stated view of the intelligence community.
As Maddow also pointed out later in the segment, the same finding that Trump is freaking out about this week was reported
back in 2013 by the same agency – and they got it wrong then.“
The Obama administration didn’t take it and run with it,” Maddow said.
“This time, the ratio between the size of that catalyst and the size of the administration’s response is a very, very, very, very, very large ratio.”
The difference between then and now, of course, is that the United States is currently run by an erratic, reckless man
who loses his cool over just about everything, from public opinion polls to critical news coverage."
http://www.politicususa.com/2017/08/...iticus+USA+%29
I'm sure Trash saw an opportunity, a pretext to blow up the Korea angle to deflect from the multiple nooses tightening around Trash and his posse of Pootin fellators.
The kicker? North didn't have a single nuke on Monday. Less than 24 hours later they were inundated with nukes. They had 'em comin' out their asses. Everywhere they looked there was a nuke.
I ain't ever seen anything like it.
Actually the same thing happened during the Obama administration. Only difference back then was the commander in chief didn't have a meltdown as soon as he saw it in the Post.
The former would throw money at them
Except he didn't.
Clinton did
Former did to iran
As did Bush. Give it time, Trump or whoever replaces him will too.
That was their money.Former did to iran
Normally I would say nothing is going to happen on any of these fronts as usual, but now we have a true idiot as President.
He has paid more taxes created more jobs
Paid more money to people then you
He's also ripped way more people off than I have. Declared bankruptcy more than I have. Made more stupid public statements than I have. Knelt to Putin more than I have.
He never broke laws with his bankruptcy
You make several stupid statements on public Internet forum
Never bowed to Putin
Russia wanted Clinton to win
DNC hack was inside job not Russia
It's bankruptcy.
Not the same.
Just bowed today to thank him for expelling Americans from Russia.
They tought Clinton would win and thought their actions would weaken her.Russia wanted Clinton to win
Then Trump should stop bowing to Putin.DNC hack was inside job not Russia
Lol China just said they will stay neutral as long as US doesnt strike NK first
There goes your pre emptive strike plans![]()
Lindsey Grahamtrying to start WW3
got
They are not neutral.
And they won't do anything. If NK test fires a test missile that lands close to Guam, and the US takes out something in NK, China will do nothing.
Emoticon on its side laughing.
You would be lost without this little guy.
I would like you to explain Trumps newest remarks.
Or answer the question:
Are Trumps statements on the forced reduction of Embassy staff in Moscow consistent with my theory?
"Trump warns of 'dangerous low' in Russia relations"
See Fact #3
http://edition.cnn.com/2017/08/03/po...tin-sanctions/
This statement is consistent with the theory and was predicted by it.
---------------------------------------
The veto-proof sanctions bill on Russia from Congress forced him to do something. His signing statement says that his administration will ignore or attempt to bypass as much as possible.
http://www.marke ch.com/story/tex...ill-2017-08-02
This action is consistent with the theory, and predicted by it.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Trumps newest Russian statements go out of their way to be obsequious and servile.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)