Reply With Quote
I mentioned a couple of them. Some people seem to need reminding.
the snowflake delusions are reaching nuclear levels
I mentioned a couple of them. Some people seem to need reminding.
Hey- did you wipe your feet before entering this thread?
You better respect this house of Mueller, s bag!
OTOH, there's no way a Starr investigation goes on for as long as it did where it did were he Special and not Independent Counsel. That's half the reason the Independent Counsel statute was allowed to expire.
Repug Rape Caucus is sure none of the were "legitimate rape"
What have I ever said that would make you think I am OK with that? Or guilty Muslims for that matter?
why not?
honest question, I'm not familiar with the respective laws.
Let's wait until the charges he's going to bring are brought. If they have something to do with Russian Collusion then, great (although the tactic of investigating/threatening everyone around a target to oblige cooperation still has a distinctly gestapo feel to it - Dershowitz is all over the place talking about this), but if they have nothing to do with collusion and are all unrelated "hey, look what we found" revelations, then I think we are going down a road that is less free than our country purports to be. Ultimately, I'll be OK because I don't break laws. Protections are only for the criminals.
I mean the behavior I talk about in the post preceding this; squeezing and threatening everyone around a target to get said target - and then "getting" that target for whatever you find. , I'd much rather Trump get voted out overwhelmingly in 2020; then he doesn't get to be a martyr.
As I understand it, Special Counsel's investigation is directed by the AG or this time the Deputy due to recusal. The AG could only remove an Independent Counsel for "good cause" or a panel of DC Court of Appeals judges could declare the investigation finished. It's difficult to see Janet Reno's allowing Whitewater to go into blue dress territory.
If enough Repugs vote to impeach/convict Trash, he won't be a martyr, except to his own ego, because other he has no cause to die for.
Of course, Trash fellators are so ing ignorant, stupid, tribal that they would act like Trash was martyr. So all those people.
How do you think every sting of organized crime is investigated (mafia)?
Exactly this way. You have reasonable proof - then nab the perimeter small time crooks and work your way inward until you get all the corroborating evidence on the boss.
Did you care about this when Ken Starr investigated Clinton for real estate Arkansas land deals - and ended up making it about blow jobs - which led Clinton to lie under oath?
It was good enough then - it is good enough now - except Trump sold out his country and then tried to cover it up. His closet full of skeletons is just collateral damage. He could have tried being honest. He could have obeyed the law. Aren't repugs furious with "illegals" who they say break the law by coming here? "Hey- what part of being here illegally don't you understand?"
So- Trump - breaks the law - nothing else matters - prosecute his orange ass.
maybe they're really ty criminals and the instant bob started digging, the floodgates open.
but you don't think prosecuting criminals is a good idea? not this time?
ive said from the beginning, follow the money.
you see, you can't launder money without help.
thanks
Just paying my respects to the Great Mueller.
In San Antonio and everywhere else- abuelitas are lighting candles in honor of the great Mueller.
Respect.
This thread shall live on with much appreciation
Schiff has a woody for Trump
Evidence in plain sight' of Trump collusion with Russia, Schiff says
Source: Politico
By PATRICK TEMPLE-WEST 02/17/2019 10:55 AM EST
-snip-
Read more: https://www.politico.com/story/2019/...schiff-1173434In an interview on CNN, Schiff rejected Senate Intelligence Chairman Richard Burr’s statements from earlier this month, in which Burr said evidence shows no collusion by the Trump campaign and Russia.
“Chairman Burr must have a different word for it,” Schiff told host Dana Bash on “State of the Union,” pointing to communications between Russia and Donald Trump Jr. and former Trump aides George Papadopoulos and Michael Flynn.
“You can see evidence in plain sight on the issue of collusion, pretty compelling evidence,” Schiff said, adding, “There is a difference between seeing evidence of collusion and being able to prove a criminal conspiracy beyond a reasonable doubt.”
Schiff said special counsel Robert Mueller’s report on potential Russian government meddling in the 2016 election might not be the final word on the matter.
Respect
By the other side.
Until people read it, or read the redacted version.
Then the lit crit starts all over again.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
