Reply With Quote
I don't think it's worth my time to respond to Odogg anymore.
LoL, you guys are hilarious! Parker is as soft as charmin. That is why we punked him and his whole team in the end. (We'll see whos glaring in the end!!) LoL! The only one who has any balls on that team is Manu, Tim and Horry, that's it. Parker's game is totally reliant upon Tim and the pick and roll. That is ALL HE'S GOT. You take away Duncan, Parker would be a spare Frenchie backup like Diaw. Total system player. You All Know it! Someone compared him to John Stockton!! LoL!! WHAT THE ??!!
Because you have no argument.
Another Spurs homer whack illusions about one of their players shot down!
I hope I didn't make you cry.
^You sure did make me cry. Guess I'll just have to go back to making pies in the kitchen for my hubby. sniff sniff**
Don't forget Finley. Well, he had balls before Jason Terry started speed-bagging them.
I'll take Parker over Terry.
That brings up an interesting point. In the last 2 seasons, there have been 18 games in which Tony Parker played but Tim Duncan did not. Over the course of those 18 games, the totally-dependent-on-Tim Duncan guy, Tony Parker, has averaged 20 ppg (including games of 30, 25, 32, 28, 27, and 35) and shot 48% from the floor, while still dishing out 6.4 assists per game.
Yeah, you're obviously right; Tony Parker can't do anything without Tim Duncan.
Kurupt : "i'm goin out loony like O Dogg."
Such conceit built on a series win decided by going to OT in a Game 7. Oh, that OT established that all of the Spurs' stars are horrid while Keith Van Horn is a lock to be enshrined in Springfield, Mass. At the end of the day one thing is certain and that is that the Mavs have the absolute worst fanbase in the NBA. Worse than the Lakers, Rockets, and Heat combined. ing Oklahoma.
Tony Parker was the best player on the team this season, better than a hobbled Duncan. Without Parker playing at his level the Spurs don't get the 1 seed.
Oh, you don't have to convince me. I was just pointing out to our friend that Parker's numbers don't seem to be dependent on Duncan's presence. He apparently just reads old criticisms and recycles them here in some weak attempt to suggest he has an argument.
I think Parker and Terry are both pretty equal, they each have their own strenths and weaknesses. It would be stupid to trade them though because they both fit in perfectly with their respective teams. Put Terry on the Spurs and he will not be nearly as effective with their style of play. The same can be said of Parker if he was on the mavs.
I think the key difference for our new friend is that Terry wears a headband. That makes him a sho nuff reel playa.
I think either would be just fine.
So far I have counted 3 intelligent Mavs fans in a metro area of 5.5 million. The stupid team has a very deep bench.
Props to the 3 smart ones.
Say whatever you want but Parker still can't hit a jumper.
You think he could have put up 32 last night hitting all over the floor, from dunks to opposite wing 3 point bombs? Yeah right. If his little floater in the lane isn't on, he's done unless it's a layup.
Yeah, Terry saved the floppin fraulein's ass last night for sure.
It's funny, you keep saying things, and you keep getting proved wrong, so you come back to this tired line -- one that is belied by statistical proof to the contrary -- as your only "argument."
Parker didn't hit jump shots against Dallas in the playoffs. At that his team was its own mistake away from sending your group home again with nothing.
Even if Parker "can't hit a jumper" -- which isn't true -- it really is insignificant in comparing the Spurs and Mavericks right now -- Parker still scored his against the Mavericks and gave the Spurs a chance to advance.
It's easy for a guard to shoot 55% in a season when he has no J. Yeah.
The funniest thing is that Terry is at the top of his game while Parker has yet to reach his.
Good times.
I'm not sure if that's the funniest thing, or if the funniest thing is the fact that Odogg has to hang around a Spurs forum, still focused on a team that has been out for 2 rounds while his team is finally playing in the Finals. It would be like a Spurs fan hanging out in some Lakers forum to make asinine arguments about the Lakers during the 1999 Finals.The funniest thing is that Terry is at the top of his game while Parker has yet to reach his.
Good times.
Sometimes I think it must really suck to be a Mavericks fan.
It's as if they have to look to us for validation or something.
Well, there is that. I think, frankly, that Mavs fans themselves are shocked to be there. They need some kind of validation or confirmation. So we end up with some visitors here.
Nothing like an off year to make another franchise's history. Oh well.
Damn straight. Dirk played like a last night and Josh did his best "Antoine Walker" impersonation. I expect them to pick it up. As far as the JT vs. Parker argument, I think I proved my point pretty well. Answer me this, could parker put up 32 last night with those array of shots? Thank you. Game over. Thanks for playing.
Like I said, this board is better than doing verbal "hi-fives" with each other like the Mavs boards are doing right now. After beating our brains in the last 5 years, its fun to finally reach the top while being complete turdknockers.
One's life must be fairly pathetic when one decides to seek out the opportunity to consciously act like a complete jackass.After beating our brains in the last 5 years, its fun to finally reach the top while being complete turdknockers.
I'd hope that Spurs fans will find better things to do than to emulate Odogg when that 5 out of 6 becomes 6 out of 7.
Still can't answer my question?
Sean Elliot sucks by the way, but I won't get into that!
Nothing beats seeing a Mavs fan expecting an answer to his own rhetorical question.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
