Is Islam peaceful?

[Yonivore]

The only thing equal is both are barbaric acts, dip .

So, why the reference to the alleged criminal acts of our soldiers? There are more than just two barbarous acts. Your statment, about not wanting to see the video of our mutilated soldiers, could have stood on its own.

Your inclusion of the jab about not wanting to see that video either, was clearly intended to draw a comparison between the two. Doing so, without acknowledging the different resolutions of each cir stances only intends to enflame and paint the picture that, just as al Qaeda condones barbarity, so does the U.S.

Asshole.

[clambake]

I'm sorry my jab somehow effects you personally. I love when you speak of morals. Explain to me the difference in both these acts. On a moral level, on your moral level. Not the consequences, the acts. Not your beloved justice system that you wrap your head around, the acts.

[DarkReign]

He is very careful not to piss off the resident moonbats too much or step on their toes.

He will poke fun at the nbadan's but will try to compensate by going after conservatives with an asshole left of Extra Stunt.

Maybe, just maybe I am not on either side, you twit.

Maybe I think for myself and take things as they come. I have explained this before. I am neither left nor right in the traditional sense.

[gtownspur]

Where in that post did i say that you were a liberal or conservative?

[smeagol]

Okay your moral equivalence is appalling.

Who can tell me the difference between the two incidents clambake has just joined?

That's right class. The United States government is investigating and prosecuting the alleged criminals that perpetrated the crime against the Iraqi family. Al Qaeda is lauding the barbarous acts of their jihadis.

Huh?

He was comparing the acts, not how governements deal with the acts. Actually he was not comparing the governemts, i.e. his comment is valid.

Actually, it would be interesting to see you criticize these soldiers the same way you criticize the terrorits (for heinous acts both parties have committed).

[Yonivore]

Huh?

He was comparing the acts, not how governements deal with the acts. Actually he was not comparing the governemts, i.e. his comment is valid.

Actually, it would be interesting to see you criticize these soldiers the same way you criticize the terrorits (for heinous acts both parties have committed).

If guilty, the soldiers should be executed.

I don't understand his need to mention the case in explaining why he didn't want to watch the video. Why not say the Nicole Simpson murder?

[smeagol]

If guilty, the soldiers should be executed.

I don't understand his need to mention the case in explaining why he didn't want to watch the video. Why not say the Nicole Simpson murder?

Because Nicole Simpson's murder had nothing to do with the war while the other two incidents are war related (the same war, mind you).

[Yonivore]

Because Nicole Simpson's murder had nothing to do with the war while the other two incidents are war related (the same war, mind you).

Actually, the soldiers' alleged acts are a crime and not an act of war.

[smeagol]

Actually, the soldiers' alleged acts are a crime and not an act of war.

Both acts were done by soldiers. The only difference is that the US soldiers perpetrated the act against civilians.

In my mind, they are both similar and have nothing to do with Nicole Simpson's murder.

You are beating a dead horse.