Reply With Quote
This pic badly needs to be turned into an "OWNED!" pic.
Photoshoppers?
LOL - CaptMike is a wooter
This pic badly needs to be turned into an "OWNED!" pic.
Photoshoppers?
two things:
1. you put too much weight in your victory over ou, ou had 5 turnovers...and the argument you forced them is garbage. cause whether you forced them or not, if you played ou again they would not have 5 turnovers...you're not 18 points better than them, but you are better
2. USC has been riddled with injuries, if you even were able to keep the game close it would only be b/c of that
if you're gonna make a confident statement don't backdoor it like that. did you see some of those hits on the OU fumbles? most of those were forced. i haven't seen a game with hitting that hard in a while.
..thats true, you did cause a majority of them. but the fact remains its uncharacteristic of ou to have 5 fumbles and highly unlikely it would happen again. you're not 18 points better than ou.
Uncharacteristic for OU to have 5 turnovers, 4 forced? True. Maybe they had them because the Texas defense is just that much better and hits that much harder than anyone else they have come against in a long time. Something I've said for a while. Learn something about football so you can stop completely contradicting yourself... rookie.
...if you could read, which you clearly cannot...then you would comprehend what i said and in what context it was used. i never said t.u. did not force turnovers in that game...i simply explained why t.u. is not 18 points better than OU. more like 7, if both teams played to their capabilities.
Uncharacteristic for OU to have 5 turnovers, 4 forced? True. Maybe they had them because the Texas defense is just that much better and hits that much harder than anyone else they have come against in a long time. Something I've said for a while. Learn something about football so you can stop completely contradicting yourself... rookie.
So saying "and the argument you forced them (turnovers) is garbage" is not saying Texas did not force turnovers. Did the definition of "garbage" change overnight? Do the rules of the english language cease to exist on your keyboard? If you could write, which you clearly cannot... then you would have not used the phrase above if you actually believe Texas forced the turnovers. You said something stupid because you probably didn't watch but 5 mintues of the game, and now you are in here trying to make statements about things you don't know. Just admit it and move on. You know nothing about this Texas team because you didn't watch them play. The only other explanation is that you watched the game but know absolutely nothing about football. Wouldn't surprise me, but I'm trying to give you the benefit of the doubt. I'm trying to say you are just a blow-hard and not a complete idiot. Accept it and Appreciate getting the benefit of the doubt.
allright Big Green grad:
this is what i wrote above:
"two things:
1. you put too much weight in your victory over ou, ou had 5 turnovers...and the argument you forced them is garbage. cause whether you forced them or not, if you played ou again they would not have 5 turnovers...you're not 18 points better than them, but you are better
2. USC has been riddled with injuries, if you even were able to keep the game close it would only be b/c of that"
...thats pretty clear. i am obviously saying that it does not matter whether t.u. forced them or not, b/c if the two teams played again OU would not have 5 turnovers (highly unlikely). but as you know, anybody can pick and choose sentences written and then post and create spin to where it appears the writer meant another thing. but, if you READ my entire post, which you obviously are incapable of, then you would see clearly what i meant.
btw, i watched a majority of the t.u. vs. OU game, as i flipped back and forth with SC vs. UDub. hey, t.u. is a good team, they just aren't 18 points better than OU.
TO: USC FAN
RE: The Rose Bowl is over
I can appreciate you guys never giving up and trying to win that game even after it's over, but when is enough enough?
Saying Matt Leinart is better than Vince Young doesn't get you 4 extra points.
Jocking Reggie Bush and rooting for UT to lose during the regular season doesn't earn you 4 extra points.
You lost, face it and get on with your lives and stop trolling the board with would ofs, should ofs, and could ofs. History can not be changed. UT beat the suppossedly best team in college football history.
Signed,
Reality
...nice wasted post. i don't think about the Rose Bowl, i simply hate t.u. and always have. i'd like them to lose every game they play...so what. it has nothing to the Rose Bowl or anything....t.u. is a rival. its simple.
Let's see here... if we take a look at these two sentences alone then you contradict yourself right there. If you believe it's garbage, then there is no way that the TOs could have been forced. You made a half ass statement, probably because you really couldn't believe the nonsense you were writing - even as you wrote it. You wrote that knowing it wasn't true, and your way of getting out of it was to make a half ass statement to give yourself an out. Good Job...
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
