Here's a flop by Parker. Do we hit people in the head as much as Utah does? (other than Nash, but head-to-head is a wash)
PlaneFast.com
This is what I said on my friend's new blog (http://freemarketsports.blogspot.com/)
Here's a flop by Parker. Do we hit people in the head as much as Utah does? (other than Nash, but head-to-head is a wash)
PlaneFast.com
Kori, Manu did not flop on that play. If you look at it, Manu stumbled sideways, and Fisher, then flew sideways in an even more exaggerated movement...it was hilarious, because Fisher made the bump to draw contact, so he could flop, then Manu turned the tables on him and got the foul called instead.
![]()
Am I really the only person that thought Fisher flopped on the previous play with Manu rolling around the pick?
To me, there's two kinds of flopping.
1. You don't get hit at all and fall to the ground like you got shot and flop like a fishThese kind of flops should be a foul (or tech) on the flopper.
2. You get hit (but not very hard) and exagerate the contact to make sure the ref calls it your way. This is crafty and shouldn't be penalized.
Both Manu and Fisher flopped. Manu definitely exaggerated the contact.
Apparently he flops so well, he even fooled you.![]()
I can agree to that. If there's contact, how do you make a judgment call over how hard the contact was when you might not have the full angle?
that was clearly flopping type 1(see Kori's post)
Another part of my thinking with that is: If you flop and there's a no-call (Fisher on the roll) and your man goes and scores, that's on you.
I might be a little biased.
![]()
Horry has performed 2 of the worst, most blatant flops I've ever seen in my life during this series so far.![]()
Well said sir.
"Ruin" the series...![]()
Yeah, ruined the series for Jazz fans is more like it.
So Manu can work a flop. BFD. Most players can (and do). Bottom line is, if the Jazz had won last night, this wouldn't have even been mentioned, much less had a topic built around it.
The Spurs simply owned some ass last night and played their hearts out. Stay tuned! There's more of that coming your way.
Damn...did somebody Taser him???![]()
Great post.![]()
Bottom line is really that the media are pissed at SA and think they cheated to beat Phoenix and they will use any reason to belittle their accomplishments this season now.
We have to accept that SA will now be a hated team. Now, is it better to be ignored or be hated? That is the $64,000 question.
What do you think?
I think I failed to answer the threads initial question, so I will here: Manure's flop didn't "ruin" the series by any stretch of the imagination.
I always thought that John Stockton was the most consistent and obvious flopper.
As long as all the ghetto hucks don't start wearing Spurs gear because they think it's "gangsta", I'm fine with it...let the haters hate...we'll just keep on winning...![]()
2nd to Vlade Divac.
Neither are still in the leauge. Sorry, fellas. I said current players.
See Robert Horry in game three for expample.![]()
If ANYTHING "ruined" the series, so to speak, it is the fact that it is being made out to be "astericks," flops, whining about officiating, poor fan behavior, dumb nba conspiracy theories, etc. I wish it could just be about basketball.
Fisher initiated the contact, and got punished for being both a bad actor and really stupid. He watched where Manu was going, veered into his path, turned his head away and stiffened up his shoulder to throw his weight into the collision. Manu didn't need to exaggerate the contact, he just made sure to take the hit squarely so the officials would get Fisher for doing something so stupid right on the heels of the previous play. The officials were going to tag Fisher for it regardless, and Manu knew that. The closest I saw to a real flop was on Fisher's second technical when Manu anticipated the foul and let Fisher pull him down.
I feel a case of deja vu.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)