Nice flame...maybe next time you can be a bit more constructive![]()
Kobe wants to go a big market city. San Antonio can dream on. His recent actions show Kobe is not San Antonio type. I think he will do great in the Eastern Conference. I would like to see him as a NY Knick. I like the Knicks and would enjoy seeing more of their games on national TV. If Kobe goes to NY, I get my wish as to seeing more of the Knicks on national TV.
Nice flame...maybe next time you can be a bit more constructive![]()
Kobe in SA would lift the ratings of 2008's finals. This would shut up those stupoid pseudo-journalists.
I say do it!
Plus, Manu is old and worthless, as the mookie crowd keeps pointing out.
I know Kobe has way more game than Manu, but for some reason I wouldn't do it. Manu does so much for this team. It doesn't show up on the stat sheet or on the Nike commercials, but Manu has as many rings as Kobe.
Let me be blunt for a minute there. You know about what Manu brings.![]()
Thanks for this thread, whottt.
didnīt you realize He was being sarcastic?
No. Are you his partner?
That was my point. This thread makes no sense. I hope the suggestion of bringing Kobe in was a sarcastic one.
I know this thread is supposed to be funny, but I am suprised at how many people took it seriously.
You do realize this can never happen, right? Kobe sells expensive LA tickets, Ginobili, Finley, Barry won't be doing that for them.
Kobe has actually said he'd love to play in SA for Pop numerous times, I'm surprised not many people know that.....
don't trade finley!
No.
He has simply been posting longer than you have.
Ohh, by the way, did you notice the flag beneath my avatar, beside the spur?
Did not think you did.
mother er, MOOKIE is the only who talks about manu, and only when manu deserves it. Do you have a crush on mookie? why do you always put his name in bold when you refer to him or his "crew"?
Spurs could offer Parker + Barry + Scola + #28....
But I still don't think that'd be enough for the Lakers FO.
Are you part of the mookie crowd too? Or are you simply one of the mookie crowd's nicks? (you sound like pimpo, but then again, you guys all sound the same).
And with respect to the bolding of posters names, I always do that, you moron.
Oh, the "he's been here longer than you" thing? me, under this nick yes.
The flag... mmm.. no me querras decir que los dos son Argentinos, no?
HAHA![]()
i was posting when mookie was in diapers.
And do we all sound alike because we share similar viewpoints that contradict your "educated" beliefs? I dont ever talk to you, but apparently they (mookie and pimpo) do and have struck a nerve causing you to constantly reference their beliefs in threads where they are nowhere to be found. You look really dumb when you do that, just to let you know.
and why am i a moron? because i dont pay attention to your weak ass posts? Sorry, but when I scroll through threads, posts by "smeagol" don't exactly jump out as potentially knowledgeable additions to the conversation.
You act as if the Lakers have an leverage in any of this. If Kobe is saying he wants out and is being the drama queen on top of being able to opt out for FA next season the Lakers have zero leverage.
I dont want him but people are looking at this as an equal value cir stance when it clearly is not.
Theoretically the Lakers have all the leverage in this case as Kobe is under contract to play for the Lakers. If it came to a legal battle with Kobe refusing to play, my guess is that the Lakers could take him to court and attempt to recoup any lost wages for him not playing. Meanwhile, Kobe may not be helping the Lakers win championships, but he's certainly not hurting the team as a member of another franchise.
And if he indeed does opt out after next season, the Lakers would be in a position to sign many of the players that are being rumored as potential trade pieces to return anyways.
Do I think the Lakers will get "fair value" for Kobe if they choose to trade him? No, the team that trades the superstar (AI, Shaq) never does...but they don't have to be raked over the coals either.
Not really. He started posting six months after you.
I find it funny that you guys always have the same opinion. Hate Bush, love anyhing that smells liberal, 9/11 is a big conspiracy, Manu sucks, etc.
I simply find them annoying. Not all the times, though. They probably find me annoying. Such is life.I dont ever talk to you, but apparently they (mookie and pimpo) do and have struck a nerve causing you to constantly reference their beliefs in threads where they are nowhere to be found.
Thanks for the insight. I will consider it in the future, given you are such and intenets hotshot, and you advice means so much for all of us.You look really dumb when you do that, just to let you know.
Many people do it, not just me. That is why you're a moron.and why am i a moron? because i dont pay attention to your weak ass posts?
Ouchh! Touche muther er! You cut me deep.Sorry, but when I scroll through threads, posts by "smeagol" don't exactly jump out as potentially knowledgeable additions to the conversation.
Now you see.. I like this one. this is true sarcasm.![]()
Manu isn't anywhere near that team player called Kobe!
Trade Manu for Hedo! NOW!
ok first and foremost...this whole manu for kobe would not even be the trade to bring kobe here if this dream thing ever paned out...it would be tony parker that la would try getting...he is young and obviously an uprising star that la would want to get thier hands on...now this trade wont happen but if it did the spurs would be amazing....manu and kobe in the same backcourt?? are u kidding??? spurs would just need to find two pgs since they really dont have a backup...but they get kobe...by far the greatest talent on the planet earth...the guy has more "talent" than mj...mj just knew how to make it work...kobe has a more complete game (range on the 3pt) but anyways....he wont come to the spurs...were dreamin...and like i said even if he did the spurs lose parker not manu...why would la take a 29 year old "bench player" for the greatest player on the planet..they take tony and him and eva live it up in la...and tony would fall off in la also..parker owes duncan for much of his success
I can't believe this thread is actually taking the whole Kobe possibility as a serious consideration and into the seventh page.
I don't care if he has the most talent in the world; Kobe sucks.
Iverson went for essentially Miller and two first rounders. Oneal went for Odom, Butler, Grant and a first.
Now again I am not saying by any means that we should attempt to make this deal but seeing that Kobe is making quite a bit more fuss and he only has one year left on his contract.
Shaq still had three years on his deal when he was traded and the 76ers got absolutely fleeced.
Really I would say 4 years of Parker is significantly more valuable then one year of Kobe who is wanting outf. To throw in Barry Scola and 28 is overkill. Thats basically two first rounders because that is what Scalo is equvalent to, 5 years of Parker and a year of Barry for 1 year of Kobe.
They can force Kobe to play and if they were to do that he could become such a distraction that it would essentially toast their season and he would be gone next year anyway. The press would go ape and if hes complaining now imagine how it would be in October.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)