because he's answering questions, dip . the questions were likely planted by coulter so she could on his grave. she' not scared of him like you are blacks, she thinks he's a got.
So when Ann Coulter says that John Edwards should have a bumper sticker that says "Ask me about my dead son," you find absolutely nothing wrong with that comment?
because he's answering questions, dip . the questions were likely planted by coulter so she could on his grave. she' not scared of him like you are blacks, she thinks he's a got.
No, I think it's crass, disrespectful, and insensitive.
But, I also think John Edwards has exploited his son's death for political points...I think he's doing the same with his wife's illness.
That, too, is crass, disrespectful, and insensitive.
I don't buy Coulter's books and I don't vote for John Edwards.
Yoni you surprise me everyday. Not only do you think a parent would use their child's death to score political points you also think he would use his wife's cancer as well. UNBELIEVABLE
It's obvious you don't have children because if you did it would be very clear to you how stupid that sounds. I get emotional even contemplating life without my child and you think Edwards is over his son's death and now uses his memory as a political pinata
It surprises me that you are so naive as to believe that's not what is happening.
There are some candidates about which I wouldn't have that opinion. John Edwards isn't one of them.
Edwards camp again turns to cash cow Coulter
There are varying degrees to which parents are willing to exploit their children and their sadnesses.
The Edwards' example isn't the most horrific but, none-the-less, it is an example.
, George, there are people who kill their children for financial gain or for sympathy. Do you honestly believe there are people who wouldn't use the unfortunate accidental death of a child for the same purpose?
It wouldn't surprise me, in the least, to find out the Edward's campaign cooked up the entire scenario -- including asking Hardball to have Coulter on as a guest.
Wouldn't surprise me in the least.
This is a guy that pretended to channel a dead child just to win a court case.
break out the tin foil, Yoni.
Some people will wish a guy dead, call him a got, and on his son's grave to make a buck, and get what they want.
Some people will plant deliberately misleading, completely fabricated evidence to justify what they want.
You're shocked?
Used her husband's campaign staff to get the phone number but, Edwards was unaware?
Okay.
As opposed to the entire GOP channeling a brain-dead woman in Florida to win over their cons uents.
Did you have a problem with that episode?
Back to mischaracterizations. What's the matter, can't stay on topic?
C'mon, you're better than clambake, aren't you?
Not if he's black, right yoni?
and got Chris Matthews to book Coulter just to give Mrs. Edwards a platform? Like I said, it's tin foil time for you.
Sorry clammy, you're inability to stay on topic and incessant posting of insubstantial responses, containing only some racial epithet directed at me, caused me to put you on ignore.
Name-calling isn't debate.
Have a nice life.
I said I wouldn't be surprised. I didn't say it was a fact.
I'm not Nbadan.
He's got this scenario in his head..........wait, where have I heard that?
It's just that the speech Coulter alleged that Edwards gave during the trial sounded similar to the speeches Frist & Co. gave during the Schiavo affair. I do agree that it is off-topic, so I will let it go.
Too bad you can't put black people on ignore.
Signed,
Ann Coulter
My recollection of Edward's venture into channeling didn't come from Ann Coulter.
I'm not Ann Coulter either.
And for those who don't believe a parent would exploit the death of their child for political gain, I give you:
Cindy Sheehan.
That must mean that everything coulter says amounts to nothing, yet, you're a fan. Thanks for the admission.
Wait a minute. Aren't you now going off topic...?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)