Reply With Quote
If you're going to lie to Congress, at least do it for a good reason, I guess.
you know how I know? he quit
If you're going to lie to Congress, at least do it for a good reason, I guess.
No. I'm saying not to believe a poorly sourced article just because you want it to be true.
Keep an open mind instead of that guilty until proven innocent at ude.
Isn't that a basic reason why we have a Declaration of Independence? Human rights!
To this date, I have not seen any evidence that Gonzales did anything wrong. Where is is.
Evidence. Not hearsay!
Just because you have been ignorant of this story from the beginning doesn't mean it has not, in fact, occurred.
WC doesnt believe evidence that isn't spun from neocon mouths
Gotta love my double negative.
OK, what am I looking for to dispute his testimony for 3/10/04?
Jesus H. Christ on a popsicle stick! You want us to connect the dots and color in the spaces for you! Get your own crayons!
In fact? Can you really state that factually and maintain your integrity? If so, I would suggest you testify to the senate committee.
I have not been completely ignorant of the story, I just haven't tried to follow it closely. I have heard counter arguments that to me are likely, but not necessarily the truth either.
Regardless, I have not seen any evidence against Gonzales!
Just hearsay, innuendo, and he-said-she-said stuff...
Of course I can. The evidence and testimony are a matter of public record.In fact? Can you really state that factually and maintain your integrity?You have chosen to remain ignorant, which is no surprise at all.Regardless, I have not seen any evidence against Gonzales!
I guess so. I’m so stupid I need help with the crayons. The 3/10 remarks clearly show the hospital meeting to be one to show Comey is now in charge. It doesn't state any quotes by Gonzales.
"Card and J. Gonzales have come and gone." Is J. Gonzales even the same person as Alberto Gonzales? I assume so, but I have never heard of him referred to that way.
Please connect the dots with relevant facts.
If Gonzales was there and left, with others still talking about the events, then why should his testimony covered about what happened after he left?
I must be stupid or something. Please connect the dots with some facts. Those assumptions tend to confuse me.
Well, I have not been able to find those facts and nobody has been able to show me those facts that show he lied.
I'm still waiting...
So where is the evidence? You say you are a Chump Dumper, but you are the chump if you cannot supply the evidence and persist it is there.
You could have the integrity to place my quote in context:
I must be stupid or something. Please connect the dots with some facts. Those assumptions tend to confuse me.
You have been given the story, the testimony and the evidence.
You haven't been able to put them together.
You are stupid.
I say this with great integrity.
I'm given a story that could easily be a fairy tail. I'd like some facts rather than fantasy.
I can easily see how ignorant people are dupped by the stories an accusations. All I'm asking for is fact rather than fiction.
If you think that my requesting facts over the words of people I don't know is stupid, then I must assume you are facing a mirror.
As good as you can muster I guess.
There is conflicting testimony between Comey and Gonzales during the senate hearing. Can you acknowledge that maybe, just maybe it is Comey that is wrong or lying? Comey resigned right after this incident you know.
You were spoon-fed the facts.
Nah, your holding your hands over your ears and eyes saying "la la la I'm not listening!"
No I wasn't. How about showing it to me.
This should be easy for you. Pretend I need a step by step tutorial with clear explanations. Since you think my mentality is low, that should be a cinch for you.
Well Chump. Looks like you lost. No facts disputing my logic.
It's all up there, posted and waiting for you to read. I know you're used to having other people do your thinking for you, but that's your problem.
My God. I've read it. I'm saying it doesn't wash past hearsay, innuendo, and propaganda. If those are considered facts by you, then you are a lost cause.
So you are accusing John Negroponte and Bob Mueller of propaganda and innuendo.
Awesome.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
