Reply With Quote
Exactly. Thats what I'm trying to say.
If that's what happened, then that's sad and a tragedy for that family. So she's supposed to give up her life, her marriage, all the good she would have done for people for the CHANCE that some kids she doesn't even know don't grow up in foster care?
Exactly. Thats what I'm trying to say.
See now you're talking about what MIGHT have happened....that's stupid. B2B is talking about what DID happen, and if it happened that way, that it was a bad decision on her part to get involved because it ultimately cost her her life. Kudos for ANYONE who tries to help and/or save people....I don't think he's advocating not trying to help, he was just saying that there could have been better ways. Of course no one thinks that they're gonna get killed by intervening, and I'm sure had she known there was that possibility, she might have re-thought things. I like to argue for argument's sake...that's just how I am...so I can see B2B's point. All he is saying is that the woman chose to get involved, and it turned out to be a bad choice. She's dead. How can any one of you not say that it was a bad choice? She's DEAD.
Don't cops/firement do taht all the time?
If that's the case, if you're ever trapped in a burning house be sure to call the police/firemen and let them know not to come because of the reasons you stated
, according to you guys none of the firemen involved on 9/11 should have died by trying to rescue people.
It's called doing something for the other people. Having heart. Too many people give a about their own lives when they're pathetic, worthless pieces of anyways.
That makes absolutely NO ing sense. You're a moron. She wasn't a cop or a fireman jackass. You're comparing apples to oranges, you're not making any sense, your arguments are weak and until you have something valid, you're wasting my time. I like insightful, well thought out, valid debates....you're just an idiot....bye.
yea telling me an idiot. nice rebuttal.
again....you're a ing moron.
and you are a genius for calling me a moron?
I'm sure if she could go into the future and see that the guy pulls out a gun and shoots her dead, she would not have interfered. she did not know that was going to happen to her, she must not have felt that much of a threat for her to go up and try to help.
i think im in love...
Ok, BACK UP. The latest reports don't even have the shooter's wife on scene, so there was nothing to interfere WITH. Poster King has info from people in the medical practice that say the shooter may have had a "thing" for the doctor.
And if that IS the case, people will start calling the guy a stalker or an obsessed person before they know the truth, when for all we know, he could have had an affair with her and she broke it off.
people who risk lives to save/help people = idiots
Why is she any different than someone like a firefighter or cop?
I'd like to hear blizz's genius.
biff your shoe is untied.
Really.
*Looks down*
King's wife is a patient there, and he's talked to people in the office. If you've ever worked in an office environment, you know that the women discuss and know everything that is going on, and that would have included the late doctor. If this guy creeped her out, she was GOING to tell someone.
And if that IS the case, people will start calling the guy a stalker or an obsessed person before they know the truth, when for all we know, he could have had an affair with her and she broke it off.
Nice random fly off to the "affair" theory, though. Bonus obtuseness points.
I like how blizz calls me a moron and left without explaining why.
Another little gem buried underneath your stack of them in this thread.
Ummm.. we don't even know that she intervened on anything, tried to help anyone, tried to break up an argument, choose to get involved in someone else's business. King (who is talking to her family) says she was just coming back from lunch and a guy, who had been bothering her previously, killed her. What should she have re-thought? Going to lunch?
What's weird to me is that in the initial news or in the police report, they never say that the killer's wife was on the scene. They just mention that they believe that his wife may have been a patient of the doctor. I don't get how anyone here jumped to conclude that the doctor "intervened" about anything.
yeah, i like how he started off blasting the doc/making jokes/being a complete insensitive moron, and now being all righteous about it. whatever. oh i also liked how he compared it to if it was a man getting shot by a woman instead. why are we even talking about that here? this woman has JUST BEEN KILLED and he wants to make arguments about "what if it was the other way around"... clueless.
Um....ok so we were talking about IF she had tried to break something up...not the lunch thing. Context clues Kori....use em.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
