Sequ and the others, wich is more objective, your post or the efficiency ranking? what about '+/- stats'
do you know that 2 season in a row Manu is AHEAD Parker and Behind Duncan in those stats
Again, why no one of the guys who claim that Tony is better than Manu answer this following post in a RATIONAL WAY? care to use arguments and baksetball knowledge instead of just looking the scoring?
CHALLENGE: ANSWER THIS WITH ARGUMENTS
To ducks and Manyu bashers...why no one of these guys who diminish manu answer this when stating that Parker is 'better' or more 'efficient'? BTW, Basketball IQ (where Manu is faaar better than Tony, wasn't considered in the original answer).... current Efficiency stats? 17.17 for Manu, 15.7 for Tony...
Care to explain how TP has proven to be better than manu? Manu stats are better (check at NBA.com, Manu this season and the past season, had better Efficiency ranking stats (more complete stats than just scoring), had better "+/- stats" (the stats counting the point Spurs scored and the received during the minutes the player is in action).
FYI, Manu has had the second best stats in Efficiency Ranking and '+/- points' in these 2 latest seasons, behind Duncan and AHEAD Parker, for instance, in the last season , Shaq and Kobe leade those stats for the Lakers, does this mean something to you?
I would also ask you...scoring option implies always beeing a better player or a more important one? would you consider Dennis Rodman in the jordan's Bulls beeing less important to other Bulls' role players just because he was scoring less than those role players?