Page 6 of 8 FirstFirst ... 2345678 LastLast
Results 126 to 150 of 178
  1. #126
    Veteran TheProfessor's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Post Count
    2,569
    I'm not sure there is a guy who has a shot to be there at 26 who can really be counted on to be a scoring wing. Rush certainly isn't, and probably will be gone by then anyways.

    I like CDR and Lee a lot, but how much can be counted on them next year is really up in the air. And they're both the types of players that (at least as of right now) if they're shots aren't following - they're not doing much to help you.
    I was extremely wary about CDR and his ability to translate his game to the NBA level. But it seems increasingly that he'll be the best wing available at our pick. I would rather go with Chalmers or the best big available, though.

  2. #127
    Body Of Work Mr. Body's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Post Count
    29,455
    It's starting to look like Orlando will take Courtney Lee at 22. I believe that will leave CDR as our only wing option left, unless for some reason Batum has a freakish fall.

  3. #128
    Believe. SPURSGOAT's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Post Count
    971
    The Spurs need a quality backup PG and at #26 Chalmers fits the bill... would be a much better option than getting one in the second round or having to worry about wasting MLE on a backup PG... I just hope that Chalmers is still around. I don't see the Spurs moving up or getting another first round pick.. they will probably stand pat with what they have.

  4. #129
    Veteran AFBlue's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Post Count
    10,868
    If this kid can play small-ball SG for 10 minutes a game and average somewhere around 20mpg total, he's a good value at #26. GET HIM!

  5. #130
    Pimp Marcus Bryant's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 1998
    Post Count
    1,021,992
    Being able to play 15 to 18 a night at point during the regular season would be enough.

  6. #131
    Believe. SPURSGOAT's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Post Count
    971
    If this kid can play small-ball SG for 10 minutes a game and average somewhere around 20mpg total, he's a good value at #26. GET HIM!
    I think he can fit the role at SG for small ball and be a quality backup to Parker. Might get some defensive assignments at times too... I can see him contributing 15-20 minutes a game by the all-star break...

  7. #132
    Ghost of Mr. K SenorSpur's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Post Count
    14,918
    I think he can fit the role at SG for small ball and be a quality backup to Parker. Might get some defensive assignments at times too... I can see him contributing 15-20 minutes a game by the all-star break...
    God, I hate SMALL BALL!

  8. #133
    I'm your huckleberry K-State Spur's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Post Count
    4,810
    God, I hate SMALL BALL!
    you can still play a big front line with Chalmers at the 2. it would be a small-ball back-court, but not necessarily 1-5.

  9. #134
    Veteran AFBlue's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Post Count
    10,868
    God, I hate SMALL BALL!
    Think how many teams go small-ball in the backcourt nowadays...

    Three that come to mind are Phx (Nash/Barbosa), Chi (Hinrich/Gordon), and Den (Carter/Iverson), but there a plenty more.

    If Chalmers can use his length to play bigger, especially defensively, then I see no reason why it couldn't work.

    Having said that, I think he is likely to get picked up before the Spurs draft....now that Lawson pulled out.

  10. #135
    Ghost of Mr. K SenorSpur's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Post Count
    14,918
    Think how many teams go small-ball in the backcourt nowadays...

    Three that come to mind are Phx (Nash/Barbosa), Chi (Hinrich/Gordon), and Den (Carter/Iverson), but there a plenty more.

    If Chalmers can use his length to play bigger, especially defensively, then I see no reason why it couldn't work.

    Having said that, I think he is likely to get picked up before the Spurs draft....now that Lawson pulled out.
    RealGM's mock draft seems to think Chalmers moves up too.

    http://realgm.com/src_feature/1266/2...draw_edition)/

  11. #136
    Mahinmi in ? picnroll's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    11,245
    RealGM's mock draft seems to think Chalmers moves up too.

    http://realgm.com/src_feature/1266/2...draw_edition)/
    If so Chalmers being taken by the Nuggets could help to free up JR Smith.

  12. #137
    Independent DMX7's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Post Count
    22,150
    God, I hate SMALL BALL!
    Small ball is not having a 6-2 shooting guard. Small ball is having 4 guards and Tim on the floor at the same time i.e., what Pop has been doing way too much this past season.

    For the record, I see Chalmers as a backup point guard. I too hate small ball. God, I hate it!

  13. #138
    Inthe land of audiophiles angelbelow's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Post Count
    9,560
    chalmers just needs to spell parkers minutes in the playoffs, and effectively run the point when given minutes in the playoffs. this is assuming we draft him though.

  14. #139
    Remember kobyz's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Post Count
    4,406
    taking Chalmers in the 26 will be a safe pick

  15. #140
    Inthe land of audiophiles angelbelow's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Post Count
    9,560
    taking Chalmers in the 26 will be a safe pick
    not if rush is still there

  16. #141
    5. timvp's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Post Count
    59,905
    HoopsAnalyst.com has a really good writeup on Chalmers:

    http://hoopsanalyst.com/0708ew14.htm

  17. #142
    My Playlist > Yours Pistons < Spurs's Avatar
    My Team
    Detroit Pistons
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    27,176
    Chad Fords latest mock on ESPN has you guys taking Chalmers.

    The Spurs have been looking for a backup point guard for Tony Parker, and you won't find a guy with more grit and experience than Chalmers. He should be able to step right in and play minutes for the Spurs.
    http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/draft2...ckDraft-080617

  18. #143
    5. timvp's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Post Count
    59,905
    Yeah, Chalmers makes a lot of sense. However, if CDR is on the board (like in Ford's mock draft), that'd be a tough decision.

  19. #144
    Damn You Commies T Park's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    55,054
    Is there any fear of Chalmers being another Jacque Vaughn?

  20. #145
    Feels bad man Mr.Bottomtooth's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Post Count
    16,539
    Is there any fear of Chalmers being another Jacque Vaughn?
    No.

  21. #146
    I'm your huckleberry K-State Spur's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Post Count
    4,810
    Is there any fear of Chalmers being another Jacque Vaughn?
    Why? Because they both went to KU? I hold that against them more than anybody, but c'mon...

  22. #147
    Damn You Commies T Park's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    55,054
    Why? Because they both went to KU? I hold that against them more than anybody, but c'mon...
    No because when Vaughn came out, his comparisions were similar.

    Great defensively, decent offensively, can run the offense.

  23. #148
    Pimp Marcus Bryant's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 1998
    Post Count
    1,021,992
    Chalmers' J is much better at this stage.

  24. #149
    Body Of Work Mr. Body's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Post Count
    29,455
    It's amazing the talent Vaughn's Kansas team had that never won a championship. Pierce, LaFrentz, Pollard, Vaughn.

  25. #150
    I'm your huckleberry K-State Spur's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Post Count
    4,810
    No because when Vaughn came out, his comparisions were similar.

    Great defensively, decent offensively, can run the offense.
    VERY different players coming out.

    Chalmers has a quality jump shot and range. Vaughn did not.

    Vaughn was a prototypical PG with good vision and a solid passer. Chalmers played OFF THE BALL the last two years.

    Chalmers is a longer defender who can guard bigger players, Vaughn relied on foot speed to stay in front of opponents.

    I don't know who is making similar comparisons of the two players, but that guy hasn't seen at least one of them play.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •