Probably and I believe they can offer roughly $6M more than the Lakers.
Pretty much, he singlehandedly saved OKC's season in Game 4 when it looked like Indy was primed to be up 3-1.
Probably and I believe they can offer roughly $6M more than the Lakers.
Yeah I was speaking in general. Definitely a good fit with Giannis.
If Jrue is truly unhappy, I could see a reroute back to the Bucks. He's still super pricey though along w/Lilliard's dead money at that PG spot. Giddey could be an option as well although he's RFA or dare I say Simmons![]()
Didn't Saric spend a year with Golden State? And the Kings owner is a massive Golden State simp?
Could it be that simple or was there a 2nd rounder involved?
If they sign him to a four year contract at $27 million per then yeah there will be ing.
Doesn't Denver still have their MLE? If they can bring in some backcourt help, they'd be #2 behind the Thunder tbh.
Murray/MLE
Braun/Strawther
Cam/Brown
Gordon/Watson
Jokic/Val
They also have that rookie coming back from injury.
Pretty damn good team tbh.
I'd be having long conversations with Sacramento and Nola right now. Both seem inept and ready to be fleeced (if there's anything left to fleece).
Sorry this is off topic, but is anyone else having trouble posting new threads and the "character limit" thing being out of wack?
CP3 should be trying to hitch his wagon to Jokic tbh. They need a reliable backup PG and that's his best bet at a ring.
Knicks signed Yabusele... I think that leaves Chris Boucher as the best option for both the Spurs and the Nuggets.
The Nuggets are really having a great off season, adding Cam and Val, and still having their MLE.
2 years away from being 2 years away.
This tbh. Denver isn't that far from LA tbh.
We don't need backup forwards, we need a starter. Collins or PJ Washington.
I’ma Boucher fan. He’d give the spurs a lot of lineup flexibility
So with Atlanta's improvement would anyone be willing to throw in their 2027 first to get the Jazz to take Vassell's contract for Collins? Spurs have to get Vassell the off this roster.
I tend to agree with this. Right now his value is so low Spurs would need to add assets to move him. That's a result of his own shortcomings, but Spurs roster construction and coaching has had a lot to do with him never improving like he was expected to. This seems like the season Spurs are starting to make sense, if Vassell hops on (improving his 3, changing his shot diet, getting to the line more often, consistently playing both ends) then the options may be different in a year. But probably not right now.
Yeah, I probably would. That pick is going to be around 20, best case scenario. Probably worse TBH.
If the Jazz are selling him hard, and still no takers, id say no. Best we can do is a bunch of 2nds.
There's going to be ing no matter what.
nah, and im as big a collins proponent there is on this board
I mean, considering the other option apparently is to trade him for Jarace freaking Walker.
No way. Maybe if we had our own pick but as much as I'd like to dump vassell Im not attaching 1sts to do it
For once I'm with Chinook on this one. Not sure why we're trying to get rid of Vassell when his value is this low unless it's a slam dunk trade for us tbh.
I think there's a fair shot he has a better start to the year and has way more value down the road at the deadline or next offseason.
They really don't. ST has lost perspective on their players because the team has underperformed their talent for years. Vassell seems overpaid but he's still one of the best players on the roster the Spurs would be weaker trading him away. If they want Collins, they can trade Barnes and one of their low-salary expiring for him.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)