This might be one of your worst takes. And that's saying something all things considered.
yeah it makes no sense given the argument.
nobody said "curry can only win with high priced free agent and trade acquisitions"... the argument was that curry can only win when his team is flooding with talent. whether that talent was drafted or later acquired is irrelevant to the argument.
Dafuq...Steph had Kirby in his rearview about 2 seasons ago
First Klay is a scrub now having him stacks the team.
Philo
Another got alt
a) when did i call klay a scrub?
First Klay is a scrub now having him stacks the team.
Philo
b) i didnt say i even agree with that argument. but your post about players being drafted vs signed was completely irrelevant with respect to the argument that was posed
lol DMC
You don't know what the you agree or disagree with. You're a weird mother er.
changing the subject.
whether i agreed or disagreed with the argument was irrelevant. your bringing up the fact that the players were drafted and not signed/traded for was completely irrelevant, and still is, irrespective of my personal opinion.
now that deflection didnt work, i'm sure your next move is to boggle the discussion down into a debate of semantics
You come and disagree with the words I use then cry foul when I point you in the right direction.
i'm not disagreeing with your word choice.You come and disagree with the words I use then cry foul when I point you in the right direction.
your point that the players were drafted by the warriors was a completely irrelevant side point. your argument was flawed, not the specific word choice. but cry more about it, instead of just saying "yeah, that wasn't a good point" and moving on like a normal person
So you then are disagreeing with my thoughts?
In order for a team to be stacked, someone has to stack it. You don't stack through organic growth. You stack by compiling established superstars. You can have a strong team (Spurs) without stacking.your point that the players were drafted by the warriors was a completely irrelevant side point. your argument was flawed, not the specific word choice. but cry more about it, instead of just saying "yeah, that wasn't a good point" and moving on like a normal person
You're just misusing the term and then trying to cover your tracks by predicting I will call you out on it.
Just admit you follow me around like some little love struck girl trying to get some attention, you disagree without even reading (proven) and then you try to talk your way out of it by accusing others of doing what you're doing, being philopolemic.
wtfYou trying to clown people, in general but, on this thread, especifically.
Resorting to cellphone induced typos vs non-1st language speakers of English
Resorting to cellphone induced typos vs non-1st language speakers of English"muh fone"
That's the espirit
We can chat in Spanish if you want. That would save me the problem of editing every other word I type, tbh.
That's the espirit
Saying Curry needs a stacked team to ring is estupid. He's never been on any other team. Who's in the stack? Himself?
You quoted the wrong comment, tbh.
No I didn't.
As a very fitting microcosm of this entire thread, DMC continues to double and triple down on stupid and goes down with the ship
Last edited by spurraider21; 05-23-2019 at 11:53 PM.
hey man i dunno why everyone givin DMC a hard time I mean just because he had a bad take in 2013
..and then kept it going into 2026 is not really you know a thing or whatever
Philo trying to narrate like anyone gives a what he says.
Ok, so why the did you reply that to me?
You wanted a discussion.
yup. either deflection or heavy emphasis on semantics.Philo trying to narrate like anyone gives a what he says.
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
