quadruple double tonight
7/23 FG
1/10 3pt
10 turnovers
![]()
He plays too fast to begin with but then he goes into turbo chuck mode in crunch time.![]()
quadruple double tonight
7/23 FG
1/10 3pt
10 turnovers
![]()
Still better than Porker tbh
But, but, all those great (empty) stats prove he "duh best ever."
<3
![]()
Last edited by HarlemHeat37; 03-09-2017 at 10:21 PM.
So good, tbh..if only he was a Spur![]()
Some idiot on this forum(don't remember the poster) was quoting me and laughing because I said OKC would be a tougher matchup for the Spurs than Denver, the other dayI thought it was a pretty obvious statement, but some posters are just silly..
When Westbrook gets a triple double, OKC is 24-6..when he doesn't, they're 11-23.."stat padding"![]()
Well, , if I knew that stat, then maybe I would have laid off him. That's a huge turnaround for his team if he gets a triple double.
or you could just say in their losses he shoots under 40%... you can always pick out arbitrary stats from win/loss splits
Seeing that he shot 33 and 17% 3p last night. Couldn't watch the game thanks to my cable company, but that sounds that tons and tons of compulsive chucking
Yet they won.
No, because the primary argument against Westbrook's MVP candidacy is that his triple doubles are generated by sacrificing wins, which is clearly false..
I agree with your point, but I didn't randomly choose an arbitrary measure for my argument..I'm directly arguing against the primary anti-Westbrook for MVP talking point..
His last 2 4th quarter performances have been indescribable, tbh![]()
With Kawhi pretty much out of the picture, I'm hoping Westbrook snatches the MVP from Harden, tbh.
Must be nice to actually have a good PG.
Russell Westbrook is the MVP. MVP! Say it! SAY IT!!!!!
Lol at a "spurs" fan ejaculating to regular season games like they mean a ing thing.
Wow I remember. You called the triple double and MVP. Props dude.
I don't think he deserves it, but you got it right.
26% shooting and 9 turnovers, wow.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)