Sorry, but I don't take a psychopath's word any more than I take a felon's word. Link your , or it's just fodder as far as I'm concerned.
He wasn't a top donor at all.
He donated the maximum he could and it was refunded.
The fact you have no idea what the maximum is just shows how ignorant you are.
Don't rely on YouTubes from felons for your education.
Sorry, but I don't take a psychopath's word any more than I take a felon's word. Link your , or it's just fodder as far as I'm concerned.
Link YOUR .
List her crimes.
List her campaign official's crimes.
Oh, right -- it's not important to you.
https://www.factcheck.org/2008/01/cr...about-clinton/
debunked ten years ago
Having to go to one of those sites paid to "fact check"
That your link s on your claim that the FEC said Hillary did nothing wrong though.
What's wrong with facts, derp?
Explain.
derpThat your link s on your claim that the FEC said Hillary did nothing wrong though.
It's obviously a sanitation project site. Clintons love "fact checking" on their own terms. And Peter Paul spent $1.9 M on three events for the Clintons, so your claim that he wasn't a top donor is obviously bull . Why did Hillary claim to not know him?
fact checking got Pavlov
The indictment wasn't about $2K check. D. Rosen embezzle $1.1 million dollars from Peter Paul en ies to the Hillary campaign.Three days after the fundraiser, we learn in the video, The Washington Post ran a short item revealing Paul's felony record; Hillary Clinton's spokesperson, Howard Wolfson, first said her campaign would accept no contributions from him, then two days later corrected himself to say it would return the single $2,000 check it had received from Paul. As for Paul's production of the gala, Wolfson said it was an in-kind contribution.
"muh fact checking"
lov
Rosen was aquitted of all charges.
And embezzlement was not the charge. False reporting was the charge.
You didn't check the facts.
lol derp
Acquitted doesn't mean the impropriety doesn't exist.
"Totally clean"
fake quote"Totally clean"
Name his crimes.
"Totally innocent"
Name her crimes, derp.
Step up.
You sperm guzzling for Hillary. That W ain't getting bigger, bro.
thanks for acknowledging it's a W for me
Thanks for acknowledging that you sperm guzzling for Hillary is a W for you
This has to be the worst Stan Lee memorial ever.
you do the exact same thing by not naming any crimes
Untrue moral relativism to try and justify your sperm guzzling.
If that's the criterion, you're guzzling more than I am.
Technically it's a W for you as well, so be happy.
It is my criterion; and I'm not the one calling Hillary totally innocent.
You're not very good at this, sociopath.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)