This should be laughed at by the judge and costs awarded against the plaintiff with extreme prejudice. ing BULL .
Iwhen I saw this article yesterday. I guess you can file a lawsuit for just about anything nowadays.....
This should be laughed at by the judge and costs awarded against the plaintiff with extreme prejudice. ing BULL .
Fyi, Star Bucks serves their coffee at 185°F and Tim Horton's ranges from 175°F- 185°F. What makes this case frivolous isn't the hardship she endured as a result, but the lack of common sense she applied to the situation such as the ill-advised practice of puting a hot cup of Joe between her legs instead of using a cup holder, and doing this despite the warning label on the side of the cup. Have we come to a point in time where people can sue for not using common sense?
Lol, just caught your reply. I agree with the frivolous lawsuit part, but that's not what I was arguing and you know that. Those two games you mentioned were end of the season games that had no bearing or implications on playoff positioning for that said team. The Heat were firmly locked into the second seed and didn't need to risk any unnecessary injuries to key players in meaningless games. And just for kicks, you threw in two games from last year's shortened and condensed season where Stern himself said he wasn't going to penalize teams for resting players. So, I'm not sure how much of a chance a lawyer would have of successfully filing a class action suit against any team for resting players in an atypical season. At the very most, fans should have been greatful there was a season played at all.
Last edited by Hoops Czar; 01-17-2013 at 05:09 AM.
Green did, in fact, get shut down for 5 days with a hammy after only playing 17 minutes in the follow on game.
#winning![]()
Yeah, the ing NBA bridge troll really needs to donate that ridiculous $250K to the Spurs legal defense fund.
A legal case on the matter in a democratic country that eventually ends with a win for the Spurs would only help display how totalitarian the NBA is.
Let's look at this from another side;
If mighty McD with their high price legal team could not win this case against a 72 y.o. lady - then McD's deserved to lose it. The plaintiff, apparently was more believable and convincing to a jury (who saw all the facts of the case - unlike the public who only saw the headlines) than the team of legal experts for McD.
I , for one , am not feeling bad for McD's.
This frivolous suit is just for publicity. What would the actual monetary damages be?
General numbers.
Just looking at November, best individual seats.
Suns $350
Spurs $425
November 29 attendance, 19703
A bit high since worse seats had a closer spread but, largest ballcourt figure:
19703*($425-$350)=$1,477,725
1/3 lawyer's class action fee = $492,575.
Not all seats are $425, the difference in the nose bleeds can't be more than $5.
Here's the actual complaint: http://www.scribd.com/doc/120648664/...-Antonio-Spurs
didnt see it posted
Looks like the claim is statutory; i can't see the Ps overcoming the causation stuff with the blanket statement: "players play down to compe ion, therefore the game being so close should be ignored" even if they establish the "knowingly deception" element. Unlikely as to the latter given the nba's tacit acceptance of the practice up until that game. , if the Ps want to bring an action against someone, it should be against the nba as opposed to a single team for failing to set a framework for when resting players is/not appropriate. Not to mention the league probably has to indemnify teams when they are individually sued anyway...
Wrt to any common law stuff-- Agreed there is no on the contract claim. Can't imagine the licensing agreements one enters into when buying tickets to a game don't expressly disclaim representations about seeing certain players. The quasi-k claims or fraud (tort) would also seem weak in the presence of an express k. Hard to argue detrimental reliance or that you where duped when you have access to the license agmt.
Last edited by CGD; 01-22-2013 at 09:41 PM.
So what happened to the bag fan who sued?![]()
He moved to Chicago...
I don't know and I don't care. I hope we never find out because that means this d-bag got what he wanted: free publicity for his ambulance chasing law practice.
"Lawsuit against Spurs is dropped"
http://www.projectspurs.com/2013-art...s-dropped.html
Can we sue them for not maintaining the winning streak until they played us, I payed good money to see my favorite team snap that heat streak!![]()
Ok, now countersue for defamation of character.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)