black lives matter activists harrass veteran @ mcdonalds, then knock him out cold

[spurraider21]

no you said that this one in particular was a BLM activist. you were trying the typical breitbart racist guilt by association schtick.

it's fairly typical for those feeling racial guilt to do that type of moral relativism.

You're just wrong.

- I was the first one in the thread to question OP's claim that they were activists.
- When asked if I thought they were activists, I said I didn't have enough information to make that claim
- However, I suggested and still maintain that this sort of action could still be considered activism by definition

[spurraider21]

I hope the resident sophist pieces of are glad they've derailed the thread into an issue of semantics

[hater]

As I said the victim a decorated d veteran said they approached him and questioned him what he thought of the black lives movement. Then they were not happy with his reply so they started harrassing him and calling him a racist.

thus there is no question they were BLM activists

dont get me wrong. I will nt believe all BLMs would do this. Doesnt make the le of the thread false thou

the veteran just mentioned it so the BLM movement can condem it. Have they?

[FuzzyLumpkins]

You're just wrong.

- I was the first one in the thread to question OP's claim that they were activists.
- When asked if I thought they were activists, I said I didn't have enough information to make that claim
- However, I suggested and still maintain that this sort of action could still be considered activism by definition

Youre justifying calling them BLM activists. Split hairs all you like.

[FuzzyLumpkins]

I hope the resident sophist pieces of are glad they've derailed the thread into an issue of semantics

You just said you were the first one to dispute the use of the term activist and now youre whining about it being derailed into semantics. Arguing every assertion and missing the point seems to be your way.

I don't think youre a sophist as I have not labeled that account as such. OTOH, I think you get asshurt, spam, and act petulant. Your round and round with chump underscores it frankly.

[spurraider21]

You just said you were the first one to dispute the use of the term activist and now youre whining about it being derailed into semantics. Arguing every assertion and missing the point seems to be your way.

at that point i wasn't arguing about terminology or the definition of activist like chump has. the original article posted didn't mention blm at all, iirc, so i was questioning the thread le

[FuzzyLumpkins]

at that point i wasn't arguing about terminology or the definition of activist like chump has. the original article posted didn't mention blm at all, iirc, so i was questioning the thread le

You said it didn't meet the definition that is how you start such arguments. You've also gleefully participated posting definitions and such.

Hypocrisy suits you.

[DarrinS]

I don't think youre a sophist as I have not labeled that account as such.

Lol, labeling accounts