o Fascism: 20 Us states about to ban protesting

[DMC]

Oh. more ad hominems. That's teaching me.

I'm not using a false dichotomy. I'm asking you a question to try to sort through your garbled mess.

No, you told me what I think then began to address your narrative.

Blake News

[DMC]

Btw - state and federal government came to the rescue during the LA Riots.

Order was only restored after members of the California Army National Guard, the 7th Infantry Division, and the 1st Marine Division were called in to stop the rioting when local police could not control the situation.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/1992_Los_Angeles_riots

Pretty sure that doesn't bolster whatever ridiculous argument you've moved onto.

I suppose the military blogged the rioters into submission? Oh wait, they have guns... and bombs.

[Th'Pusher]

I suppose the military blogged the rioters into submission? Oh wait, they have guns... and bombs.

So what was your point about local law enforcement failing during the LARiots and who is it that you are afraid is going to come take your guns?

[CosmicCowboy]

The one that didn't attempt to secede, ergo "more perfect union". Hard to have a union when you secede from it.

Pretty stupid definition. By your definition the usa as founded in 1776 wasnt "we the people".

[CosmicCowboy]

Simple fact is since the beginning of mans ability to draw on cave walls, the winner gets to write the history.

[Blake]

It doesn't matter. You're a forum cuck. This is well established.

Name calling wins the debate every time huh

[Blake]

No, you told me what I think then began to address your narrative.

Blake News

The question is still there. It's the one with the question mark at the end.

[DMC]

Pretty stupid definition. By your definition the usa as founded in 1776 wasnt "we the people".

That doesn't make any sense.

[DMC]

The question is still there. It's the one with the question mark at the end.

It's based on the false narrative you created.

[Blake]

It's based on the false narrative you created.

trying to flip blame

it's your claim everyone is making fun of here, not mine. Sorry you don't understand how re ed it is.

[DMC]

So you think we need an armed government to keep our freedom of speech.

What happens when the armed government suppresses free speech? Does the 2nd amendment then kick in for civilians too?

trying to flip blame

it's your claim everyone is making fun of here, not mine. Sorry you don't understand how re ed it is.

Keep flailing cuck boy

[Blake]

Bombs work too.

This is you posting. Not me.

You're all over

[DMC]

This is you posting. Not me.

You're all over

Are guns the only mechanism to ensure that a right is secured?

Bombs work too.

More Chumpdumper JV debate team from cuck boy

[CosmicCowboy]

That doesn't make any sense.

By your definition the founding fathers were all traitors. Tories were "we the people"

[DMC]

By your definition the founding fathers were all traitors. Tories were "we the people"

The confederate states had their own cons ution. The term "We the People" came about after 1776. Once you leave and form your own government, you're not part of this specific "We the People". They had their own "We the People of the confederate states" which differentiates them from the prior "We the People" with whom they once belonged.

"We, the people of the Confederate States, each state acting in its sovereign and independent character, in order to form a permanent federal government, establish justice, insure domestic tranquillity, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity — invoking the favor and guidance of Almighty God — do ordain and establish this Cons ution for the Confederate States of America."[1]

Prior agreements did not contain the phrase "We the People".

Granted, the states never actually left, but they tried to. So given the choice between two armies (as I was), the union army was comprised of folks who did not intentionally separate themselves from the rest.

[Blake]

More Chumpdumper JV debate team from cuck boy

You're saying bombs are OK under the 2nd amendment.

do civilians have a right to bear bombs?

[Blake]

The confederate states had their own cons ution. The term "We the People" came about after 1776. Once you leave and form your own government, you're not part of this specific "We the People". They had their own "We the People of the confederate states" which differentiates them from the prior "We the People" with whom they once belonged.

"We, the people of the Confederate States, each state acting in its sovereign and independent character, in order to form a permanent federal government, establish justice, insure domestic tranquillity, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity — invoking the favor and guidance of Almighty God — do ordain and establish this Cons ution for the Confederate States of America."[1]

Prior agreements did not contain the phrase "We the People".

Granted, the states never actually left, but they tried to. So given the choice between two armies (as I was), the union army was comprised of folks who did not intentionally separate themselves from the rest.

Did the confederate states have the right to bear bombs?

[DMC]

You're saying bombs are OK under the 2nd amendment.

do civilians have a right to bear bombs?

Follow the conversation, cuck.

JV Chump

I don't dance for you.

[DMC]

Did the confederate states have the right to bear bombs?

Your ex bared both her bombs for everyone tbh

[Blake]

Follow the conversation, cuck.

JV Chump

I don't dance for you.

I'm asking my own questions.

I don't really care who you are dancing for. I don't understand why you'd rather dance than answer the simple questions

[Blake]

.

[DMC]

I'm asking my own questions.

I don't really care who you are dancing for. I don't understand why you'd rather dance than answer the simple questions

.

You have your answer, Chump lite.

[Blake]

You have your answer, Chump lite.

K, I'm fine just laughing at you trying to bully your way out of your re ed 2ND amendment claims.

Lol.