What crimes?
The thread is not about reviewing Hillary's litany of crimes. Nice try. I certainly knew that wording it how I did would trigger snowflakes like you if that means anything to you.
What crimes?
friggin snowflakes
You done being a laughing stock?
By your own definition, your complete failure to name Hillary's crimes brands you a laughing stock.
![]()
Spurtacular covering up for Hillary's crimes more than CNN is pretty entertaining though.
How about you show you're not a laughing stock, and maybe I can take you seriously.
He's paid by Soros tbh.
It would if "can't" applied as it does in your case.
hannity about to fill spurtaculer cupboard of hillary crimes
You can't.![]()
What crimes? Name one.
What crimes did she commit, OP of a thread about Hillary committing crimes?
Cheap come-ons will never work. I keep telling you that. You ready to stop being a laughing stock?
You can't name any.
You can't name any.
Lashing out, coming out.Spur gular.
It's really about the Nate Silver call. All you Hillary shills want to make it about defending your criminal, though.![]()
It's your thread le and you can't name even one crime.![]()
Anybody ever see that really old abbot and costello routine with the who's on first?
Is that the one where Bud says "Who's on first?" and Lou screams "No, you're crying!" and runs away?
See that's what's funny. All of a sudden when i ask for proof or evidence of your claim, i'm a "hillary shill" instead of a normal person with healthy skepticism of wild claims.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)