doesnt mills have two years left after this season? And pau has 7 mil guaranteed next year
Pau, Patty and a future 1st round draft pick. Mills is an expiring contract.
Yeah Wizards could probably get something better for Beal but he will be out of the East.
doesnt mills have two years left after this season? And pau has 7 mil guaranteed next year
This whole thread is based on nonsense. I’d love Beal or for the spurs to at least inquire about him but the article doesn’t say the spurs are interested it says nba execs expect spurs to be interested.
en worthless
I think the Wiz would insist on Lonnie being part of the deal. He seems to be a natural SG like DeRozan and Beal.
DeRozan and Aldridge for Beal and Porter.
White
Beal
Porter
Gay
Poeltl
Mills
Forbes
Belinelli
Bertans
Gasol
And we make the WCF easily. these two useless "stars", tbh.
Pau + Lonnie + metu + Belinelli and both 1sts for Beal and green
Good trade for Spurs. Not sure if the wizards would do it. Would love a Murray, Beal, Porter, Gay, Poeltl starting 5 next year
The Wizards are ed as it is. They might as well shake things up and see where it takes them.
Their way of looking at it is that they are adding two 2nd team all-NBA players for a borderline all-star and a role player. Looking it at that way the Spurs could get greedy and even ask for a draft pick.
Anyway, pipe dream. We all know Pop would never "betray" his players like that.
Been posting that for weeks. But ST thinks LMA and DeMar are the keepers that we should build around.![]()
What's wrong with wanting to get a 6'8" 25 year old 3 and D guy who shoots 40% on 3's for his carreer and has been a net positive for the past 4 seasons, even with the ty Wizards?
He costs 26 mil per year.
Porter isn’t that good, he doesn’t set his teammates up, he isn’t aggressive on offense at all, often stands in a corner, he isn’t much of a shot creator, atrocious transition defense lazy/doesn’t carehorrible contract, wizards were idiots to match, should have let him go to nets
the transition d will guarantee he’s never a spur anyways, feel free to dream
I prefer to pay Porter 26 than DeRozan 28.
Last edited by DAF86; 12-23-2018 at 12:46 AM.
There are worse contracts. Like paying $28M/yr for Mills/Gasol
Forget Beal. I've been wanting Thomas Bryant for almost two years
Hahaha.
If you could, would you have taken Tobias Harris and the 12th and 13th pick in the most recent draft for Kawhi?
I prefer that to DeRozan/Poetl.
I don't know, at that time I wasn't very high on either option.
You can move one of them any given time without hurting your future much. Paying Porter superstar money is not good. He will eat about 25% of your cap and he is an outside chance of being an all-star, let alone a leader of a team. Both LMA and DD have earnt their paycheques, not because of one good year or even two, but for years of being an allstar.
Derozan's NBA achievements:
4× NBA All-Star
All-NBA Second Team
All-NBA Third Team
Porter's NBA achievements:
The Spurs could afford to pay Porter's salary for the rest of his contract. So long as that's true, it really doesn't matter how much he makes. The most important thing is that he'd fit their roster both with and without Murray. Obviously, someone like Robert Covington is a WAAAAY better option. But that dude isn't available. Other options might be available, but there are Porter trades that I think would totally work for the Spurs.
DeRozan's On/off stat for an 18-16 team: -14.2
Porter's on/off stat for a 13-20 team: +7.7
If only wizards played porter more, they would be winning.
I'm certainly not trading DeRozan for Porter. The goal would be for him to compliment/"finish" the starting lineup. If the Spurs had another dominant lead guard like Kemba, then maybe like on/offs would matter. But as the Wolves are showing, adding "high-impact" role-players at the expense of stars is not conducive to winning.
Beal's a different story, though. Him instead of DeMar would raise the Spurs' ceiling quite a bit.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)