That's why I didn't post an answer for your ignorant ass.
You love being bitter and stupid. I'm not going to stop you.
don't give a about anything you have to say you ing troll. off !
That's why I didn't post an answer for your ignorant ass.
You love being bitter and stupid. I'm not going to stop you.
nah dude, i ing don't like you you ass pos. how is that so hard to understand? how are you such a day to day to think that after someone has told you what i have on numerous occasions that all of a sudden that person wants to chit chat with you? go play in traffic you ing re !
And yet, here your pathetic weak ass is, chatting up a storm.
Just shut the up if you don't want to discuss anything on a discussion board.
You have no self control. You're weak.
it's not about not discussing anything on a messageboard as much as it's about not discussing anything with your ass.
you're like a stalking ex... wtf is wrong with you? no man acts like you do and that's why i call you a sissy, a , a pos, a loser, a spineless hack, etc... you are truly pavTHETIC!
You're the one talking to me when you don't want to talk to me.
Just shut the up.
Be a man.
dude, you were on your best behavior for like a week and didn't bug me once. all of a sudden today you decide to blow me up and act like i'm the one putting you out. just off. how is that such a hard concept to grasp? i don't ing like you one bit but you keep on keeping on for whatever ass reason you've made up in your re ed head. i wish dudes like you would get your asses kicked daily because god knows you need a reality check for once.
btw, way to ruin every thread you ing pussy!
Just shut the up.
Don't reply to me.
Don't read my posts.
Be a man.
Take responsibility for your own actions.
Don't blame others.
seriously, eat a ing bullet already and do us all a favor.
Quit projecting your weakness on others.
You have work to do.
Thanks.
Losing out on federal funds would be a plausible injury.
Yep. The legal argument to prevail on the merits would be different (invalidating the executive order), but standing would be the same regardless, as the damages are the same.
Moot anyway, since Trump caved on the Q and reverted to Commerce's original advice -- to request information from other agencies.
The phrase that set my hair on edge yesterday was "draw districts based on voter eligible population." It's a radical idea that would deny millions of US citizens representation. It would also make political power, older, whiter and more rural.
Trump's pivot is even more radical than that.
Drawing districts by voter eligible population wouldn't count anyone under 18 or in a prison. It would also skew power even more to the countryside, as immigrants -- legal and otherwise -- tend to congregate in cities.
relevant SCOTUS case:
https://www.scotusblog.com/2016/04/o...ill-undefined/While virtually every argument used by the Ginsburg opinion in favor of basing representation on total population (because elected officials supposedly represent everybody and not just the voters) points toward a cons utional mandate, it turns out that the states actually are not bound by the Cons ution to craft new election districts by starting with total population. The only thing settled cons utionally now is that the states also are not required to divide up districts by using the voting population to be assigned to each, making them equal. Should a state do it that way, the opinion seems to say, the Court will then face that issue.
https://casetext.com/case/evenwel-v-abbott-1
Apparently the WH released the EO on the census question to reporters before it backed up.
There's nothing in there about "better enforcing the Voting Rights Act," underscoring the fact that Trump had his lawyers lie to the Supreme Court.
What's worse is that four Justices didn't mind that he did.
https://www.do entcloud.org/do e...ive-Order.html
So USA has no idea how many citizens reside within its own borders?
Come on this is no longer a colony, get your house in order.
all i'm reading is, "i want more illegals no matter how much the usa is becoming a 3rd world country. as well, i want more liberal reps to destroy this country."
i don't see the big deal in asking citizens if they're citizens. bye bye illegals!
what makes you think so?
we do a head count every 10 years, we have a pretty good idea..
If that's what you see, you don't read very well.
Which the court found to be the case. They lost their ass on this one. It was fun to watch.
The citizenship Q on the 2020 Census is officially dead.
Half the reason he's dog whistling something else.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)