Reply With Quote
That's classified!
Is that a question or a statement?
That's classified!
It's whatever spin it takes to make Bush great.
Is that a sentence or a question? Or both?
Nah, just funny seeing Bush in a flight suit.
Gtown, what's with u and fetishes and homeroticism? I'm a man. These are not things you should ask me, I'm straight Gtown. You may wanna look elsewhere.
All questions are sentences, but not all sentences are questions.
You might need a Venn diagram to avoid confusion.
just say both
It's a quentence.
Or a suestion.
Whichever sounds more erotic.
Stupid, who cares. SO i typed a ? instead of a period. WHooptee do. all you bags did was waste your hot air on a grammar mistake when you clearly lost an issue.
You see. I don't think any of you give a damn about the fact that you cannot declassify war strategy. You'll act stupid as if the fact went in one ear and out another. You're arguments have no substance, and you try to steer the conversation from the facts and go into little trivial stuff. Just face it you lost the argument. IF all you can post about is about making one grammar mistake, then you have nothing worth debating about.
i mean what's so funny about an exit strategy being classified. Is that news to you. Do you think independent thinking people who read your post think you have a clue when you can't grasp the idea of the president's strategy for war being classified? Seriously, when in the History of the World has a nation shared it's details of a classified war planning with the public during an act of war? WHen? THat's right. And in the mean time all you can do is taunt people and bring up stupid photshop images, while not awnsering the issue yourselves.
Ask yourself, would you as a president foil the military's planning by declassifying it to the public? I thought so.
IF you cannot bring a coherent argument of why a president should declassify a war strategy, then i suggest you drop it.
It must be so highly classified that not even Congress or the Senate are aware of its presence.
My question to you is that if both Congress and the Senate are still in the dark about the existence of an exit strategy, how can you be so sure one exists?
I understand your argument about not wanting to reveal exactly what the plan is, but you are not understanding my argument. I am not asking for the details of the plan, I just want to know if one exists. If our own legislature doesn't know if one exists, how can I just assume that this administration has one in mind?
Finally a decent post.
One does exist and the president has alluded to it. But what the democrats want is a timetable. And when you put a timetable on progress, that's basically saying that one will withdraw only on time issues, no matter the outcome. The terrorist would twist our time table expectations as a victory for alqueda.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
