Mavs at it again - more bogus technicals

**dieman8686** · 06-02-2006

Here I'll post it again so TW can "attack" me again.

Stupid ass whiners. First of all lets go back to the Spurs Mavs series, where you guys about Dirk getting so many FT's. Lets gets some facts here, Dirk had attempted 80 FT's(shot 73-80) in the series, and here is the good part Tim Duncan had 90 FT's(shot 66-90). I wonder who attempted more FT's?(HMM) Now listen up guys, the difference is by 10 points, BUT about 70% of those FT's came on three point plays, while Dirks mostly came from shooting two; now tell me who really got more calls on their behalves a LOT more. Sit down, shut up and get your ing ass off this subject.

Now, you can't and whine because your team is fishing, so you come and attack us again with your moronic thoughts that there is some kind of conspiracy for us to win. Bell's T was a correct call, if you didn't noticed, he pushed off while the OPPosing player was still in the air, and a whistle was already blown, so there was no reason for him to even touch him. You whining es only point out calls on the Mavs way, if you didn't watch the whole game, the only reason why the Suns came back in the second qtr was because on bogus calls on who ever was guarding Nash(look I'm crying like you guys) for the entire qtr. Oh yeah, it's also funny how you guys don't mention the T on Terry when he was reaching and swiping for the ball, which truly was not a Tech, unlike the Bell one(which you guys of course don't believe happened or won't accept it). That play gave them 3 points, The Tech on them gave us 4 points; oh ing wow that sure made the difference in the game.

Dirk having 50 points and 12 rebounds had nothing to do with us winning the game by your stupid standards right? AND every call he gets is never a foul right? AND Mark is paying the refs right ( )? AND you guys aren’t whining es right? AND these questions aren’t rhetorical questions right?

**jamezyjamez** · 06-02-2006

Originally Posted by Spurologist

Come to think of it. Cuban would have been soiling himself all night trying to come up with hours of video tape for Stu Jackson.

Yep, just like Pop. And maybe Jason could whine to the media "Yeah he hit me a couple of times" like the pansy Tony Parker. Even Phil Jackson had the balls to say that he did not want Raja to be suspended so it could be settled on the court.

I guess the classy Spurs fans need to talk to their coach about being classy instead of asking Stu Jackson to suspend the player who has been kicking his team's ass all series.

Oh well, I guess he can be classy now at his wine tastings....

**dieman8686** · 06-02-2006

Originally Posted by Spurologist

Seriously man is this all you attack people on to ignore or dodge anything that is true or offends you?

**Holmes_Fans** · 06-02-2006

Originally Posted by Spurologist

Come to think of it. Cuban would have been soiling himself all night trying to come up with hours of video tape for Stu Jackson.

Every team send in videos for the league to review. When was the last time Cuban hasn't sent in video since the round1 series last year when Yao Ming was making 20 moving picks a game. Cuban actually cares about his team winning, not like most owners who are just their for money and own redneck farming equipment companies.

**Trainwreck2100** · 06-02-2006

Originally Posted by dieman8686

Yet, you never comment on anything I said? What, you replied is just plain out revelant to anything I said. What facts hurt? Oh yeah, I'm a troll, comment on what I said or don't say , meaning you did shutup.

Because you trolls aren't following a set structure, one of you say
"don't bring up the past it's for blah blah blah"

Whilst another one (you) so readily brings it up. Like I said make up your ing mind.

**DuncanInYourFace** · 06-02-2006

Originally Posted by dieman8686

Here I'll post it again so TW can "attack" me again.

Stupid ass whiners. First of all lets go back to the Spurs Mavs series, where you guys about Dirk getting so many FT's. Lets gets some facts here, Dirk had attempted 80 FT's(shot 73-80) in the series, and here is the good part Tim Duncan had 90 FT's(shot 66-90). I wonder who attempted more FT's?(HMM) Now listen up guys, the difference is by 10 points, BUT about 70% of those FT's came on three point plays, while Dirks mostly came from shooting two; now tell me who really got more calls on their behalves a LOT more. Sit down, shut up and get your ing ass off this subject.

Now, you can't and whine because your team is fishing, so you come and attack us again with your moronic thoughts that there is some kind of conspiracy for us to win. Bell's T was a correct call, if you didn't noticed, he pushed off while the OPPosing player was still in the air, and a whistle was already blown, so there was no reason for him to even touch him. You whining es only point out calls on the Mavs way, if you didn't watch the whole game, the only reason why the Suns came back in the second qtr was because on bogus calls on who ever was guarding Nash(look I'm crying like you guys) for the entire qtr. Oh yeah, it's also funny how you guys don't mention the T on Terry when he was reaching and swiping for the ball, which truly was not a Tech, unlike the Bell one(which you guys of course don't believe happened or won't accept it). That play gave them 3 points, The Tech on them gave us 4 points; oh ing wow that sure made the difference in the game.

Dirk having 50 points and 12 rebounds had nothing to do with us winning the game by your stupid standards right? AND every call he gets is never a foul right? AND Mark is paying the refs right ( )? AND you guys aren’t whining es right? AND these questions aren’t rhetorical questions right?

The thread le is about bogus technicals, not about your PMS.

May I reccommend: http://www.pms.org.uk/

**Holmes_Fans** · 06-02-2006

Originally Posted by dieman8686

Seriously man is this all you attack people on to ignore or dodge anything that is true or offends you?

You have to post in spanish.

**Spurologist** · 06-02-2006

Originally Posted by dieman8686

Seriously man is this all you attack people on to ignore or dodge anything that is true or offends you?

because your post doesn't warrant a response

Originally Posted by dieman8686

Read my last post there is your reason.

Originally Posted by me

ehhhhhh. Then why didn't he call it right on the spot. Did he have to check with Mark Cuban in the stands. Make the ing call as you see it.

How about responding to my posts

**jamezyjamez** · 06-02-2006

Originally Posted by Spurologist

because your post doesn't warrant a response

How about responding to my posts

We would, but it's too much trouble scrolling past your sig with the pics of Manu and TP waiting for weiner insertion...

**Shank** · 06-02-2006

Trainwreck, what's that crazy ass gif in your signature? It's confusing as , but I can't stop watching that he-she wink at me.

**leemajors** · 06-02-2006

Originally Posted by Shank

Trainwreck, what's that crazy ass gif in your signature? It's confusing as , but I can't stop watching that he-she wink at me.

yes, please tell. that wink is hypnotizing.

**Trainwreck2100** · 06-02-2006

Originally Posted by dieman8686

Here I'll post it again so TW can "attack" me again.

Let me clear something up, this is me if I were to attack you. Keep in mind this is a hypothetical. I really don't mean any of it.

You're a smoking loving cuban humping . Who's full of as much horse as a goddamn racetrack.

Did I say that, no. Now if you still feel I attacked you, you are welcome to analyze the post word for word and find instances where an attack could have come from and send it to the powers that be, that's what you mavs people do anyway.

**dieman8686** · 06-02-2006

Originally Posted by Trainwreck2100

Because you trolls aren't following a set structure, one of you say
"don't bring up the past it's for blah blah blah"

Whilst another one (you) so readily brings it up. Like I said make up your ing mind.

Wow dude! The only reason why I posted the first paragraph was so must of you guys would shut up about Dirk having so many FT's and making excuses that thats the reason why you lost the series. It's called sarcasm.

**Spurologist** · 06-02-2006

Originally Posted by jamezyjamez

We would, but it's too much trouble scrolling past your sig with the pics of Manu and TP waiting for weiner insertion...

We?

I guess it is a ing troll invasion.

**timvp** · 06-02-2006

After watching these playoffs, I think the NBA should change it's logo:

**Spurologist** · 06-02-2006

Originally Posted by timvp

After watching these playoffs, I think the NBA should change it's logo:

they should add that in a playoff promo

**jamezyjamez** · 06-02-2006

That's pretty good for a logo...an even better logo would be the red, white, and blue but change the silhouette of the guy dribbling to Tim Duncan with his palms up like after he gets a foul called on him.

**Trainwreck2100** · 06-02-2006

Originally Posted by Holmes_Fans

You have to post in spanish.

Yes because all of my 7000+ posts in english have come from just luck, in fact the extent of my english is just every in g word I've said on this forum and I know nothing else after this post explaining that. Como se dice Tu estas " " en ingles.

**Holmes_Fans** · 06-02-2006

I know, Tim Duncan had 90 ing free throws. It's outrageous, he was doing the illegal move and still getting the refs love.

**leemajors** · 06-02-2006

Originally Posted by jamezyjamez

That's pretty good for a logo...an even better logo would be the red, white, and blue but change the silhouette of the guy dribbling to Tim Duncan with his palms up like after he gets a foul called on him.

keep trying, you may luck out and post something funny or worthwhile.