Reply With Quote
Case closed indeed.
LoL! You guys are great!! The OBVIOUS answer to my rhetorical question would obviously be not only NO, but NO!!! Thus, proving my point that JT > the french scrub.
Case closed. <gavel>
Case closed indeed.
Parker might not get 32 on the wide variety of shots that Terry jacked up last night. But: (a) one game does not prove your point; and (b) Parker does so many other things that Terry can't do, that it nullifies whatever point it is you're trying to make.
For instance, I'll start buying your argument (a bit) if the Mavs are up 1 in overtime in Miami in a must-have game and Terry has to defend Wade and deny him a good look. I'm certain that Jason Terry couldn't have made the play on Rip Hamilton that Parker made at the end of Game 5 last year. Absolutely certain.
Yes, of course. Probably because you either don't really have an argument (which would be par for the course) or because you don't want to get owned (which would be wise). Luckily for you, this thread isn't about Sean Elliott.
To answer your question, YES.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mQyHZ...=Tony%20Parker
It's not like Terry hung 50 pts on them or anything. 32 is not that big a deal.
Tony Parker, without a doubt.
I guess the only things Parker couldn't do would be pointing to his headband as well as blowing a wide open layup.
You guys are so full of !! LoL.
"Parker does sooo many OTHER things better! "(Than score) Like turn the ball over at critical times while waving the white surrender flag!! I thought you people were tough, the whole Alamo thing!! I guess when you are as soft as the French are, you can't help but turn into them.
I have had enough of this!! Now I expect to see some validation and ummm confirmation and some submission from all of you weewee's!! If we don't get that soon, you will regret! In about one week I am expecting to see all of your puckering lips leaning down to kiss our new shiny rings! If you refuse to obey, I will instruct my glory hogging, "oh look at me" mavs owner to buy your town and change the name to cubanville.....and you will all have to wear the same haircut!
Well, you might have thought we were tough but we certainly didn't think you were smart.
How about you pay moms her rent and we'll call it even?
Moms rent? OK. Whats the address?
You don't know where you live? Not that surprising, really.
A minute after the Finals are over, that ring is history. And if I've learned one thing from Mavs' fans, it is that history is irrelevant. Accordingly, if the Mavericks are fortunate enough to win the le, those rings become wholly irrelevant to anything that happens in the NBA from that point forward. It will be history, after all.
No kidding. I'm sure there will be an addendum: only rings won after 2005 count.
Keep dreamin buddy.....Keep dreamin.....
We will be REIGNING NBA CHAMPIONS!!!
Last edited by Kori Ellis; 06-09-2006 at 05:49 PM.
A Cuban fan calling out gay ?
Yes, "Go Mavs GO!!" is quite "gay."
What are you talking about? I have fond memories of history. The way the spurs kept knocking us off and winning another ring. Thats why I am sad to see the spur dynasty being dropped into that hole and covered with dirt.
Just Kidding.
The past rings are quite relevant most of the time. The time they're not is when Spurs fans insist that their team is still "better" even after losing a 7-game series to the Mavs and resort to A) ing about the refs and B) citing past championships as if they are somehow indicative of this year's teams.
Yeah, with that overwhelming series win that took 7 games + OT to settle. Obviously the Spurs have no future.
Yes, only Mavfans are allowed to do that. Especially when they win.and resort to A) ing about the refs
Actually, they're quite relevant whenever we feel like it. If it bothers you that much, seek professional help.
That's rich, really. For most of the past season and all of the most recent playoff series, the war cry of Mavericks fans was that past rings mean nothing. That was before the Mavericks won. Those admonitions had nothing to do with the end of the series, because they arose before tip-off of Game 1.
All I'm saying is that Mavericks fan told me that even the Spurs' 2005 championship meant nothing when discussing a matchup of the 05-06 Spurs and the 05-06 Mavericks. I'm certain that you'll welcome my use of that bit of rhetoric in comparing the 06-07 Spurs and the 06-07 Mavericks, assuming, of course, that the Mavericks win 3 more games.
So, "nothing," it seems, means nothing -- unless, of course, it's the Mavericks "nothing," in which case it will apparently mean everything.
And in the spirit of the thread, I'll take Parker.
7 games and overtime. Don't forget about the refs!!! The ref stories are my favorite!!
But this is the beginning of a new trend. Next year will take only 6 games. The year after probably 4. You will be complaining about duncan's outragous contract and how it's killing the teams chances. Upset at how eva completely screwd with tonys head. Gino will be an nba analyst for spanish espn.
Don't you sense the collapse?
I agree. It will be fun to see the Spurs put the Mavericks away in Game 6 at the AAC as the fans rain down their spite on Joey Crawford.
Game 4 at home in 2008 will be great too. It will be a nice bookend to the SA put-away the Spurs had in 2001.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
