Reply With Quote
And you're ing about Bledsoe as if he brings it each week. Give me a break!
If Stallworth and Westbrook are healthy, the Cowboys wouldn't have had that chance.
And you're ing about Bledsoe as if he brings it each week. Give me a break!
I've got to go wash the stink of this game off of me.
They're ahead until the Cowboys can get some production from the QB. Why in the they didn't throw more fades and three step drops against the blitz is beyond me. Oh, wait... because Bledsoe can't throw the ing fade. He completely misses TO for an easy TD by underthrowing any ball that requires touch. He's done.
philly's turnovers were far less costly, they defintely deserved to win the game. they have a much better decision maker at qb, and someone who can evade the pass ruch much better. that puts them a nose ahead of the boys for sure.
Parcells needs to go Tony Montana and "Cancel his contract"
I personaly think the Cowboys were lucky to be in the game today.
i was responding specifically to the philly running game part of your post. i am ing about bledsoe because he cost us the game himself.
And you're ing about Bledsoe as if he brings it each week. Give me a break!
Even with the blown coverages and turnovers they had this game right there until the end. That's some frustrating .
Because the Eagles are not a good enough team to put them away playing at home against a team completely ing up. No luck.
I personaly think the Cowboys were lucky to be in the game today.
Tell us again how great the Redskins are!
I personaly think the Cowboys were lucky to be in the game today.
I know what you were doing. You ing about Bledsoe is akin to me ing about the Philly running game. Both usually suck eh? So why are either of us suprised they weren't there today?
The Redskins aren't good enough to be in this conversation.
Sadly, the Redskins are worse than both of these teams.Tell us again how great the Redskins are!
The Redskins are easily the worst team in the NFC East. The Eagles are ahead of everyone, then I guess its a toss up between the Giants and Cowboys.
By the end of the season, I believe the Redskins have the ability to surpass the Giants and Cowboys, but I'm not sure they can surpass the Eagles.
Leave it to Drew ing Bledsoe (he is now in the same category as Greg ing Davis) to completely UP my perfect day of predictions. Son of a .
I don't know what the lines were, but I probably would have made some good money off of this one.
Laugh it up, but 2-2 is marginaly better than 2-3. Cowboys fans have this great feeling that their team is head and shoulders above what they actually are. So far they've beat a very injured Redskins team and the ans. Thats not exactly an impressive run down of teams.
On the other hand, the 2 games against better teams they've looked horrible.
So explain to me again why the Redskins are somehow not going to be able to surpass the Cowboys?
I should have a sports gambling informercial charging $9.99 a minute for predictions.
It's frustrating to see so much talent get wasted by a scarecrow QB. Can't disagree with you.
I need a complete destruction of Baylor this weekend to take this taste out of my mouth...
I'd like to have somebody explain to me how the Redskins have a part in a conversation about the Cowboys and Eagles.
And if we want to talk common opponents, let's see how well the Cowboys respond to the Texans next week.
How do you think I feel?
I'm watching playoff baseball without my Braves for the first time EVER. The Cowboys got kicked in the nuts and Texas State lost to ing SFA yesterday.
The Redkins were brought up above ass munch. As if threads in this forum ever stay on subject.
The Cowboys will likely respond the way every team who plays the Texans responds, by kicking their ass. Then the Cowboys will likely be at 3-2 with 3 weak wins.
Congrats!
BTW, if for some reason the Cowboys can't beat the Texans next week, just give up on the season.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions