Thank you, Spurs, Mr. Stern

[NBAisDead]

Without any proof in hand, your weak-ass threads become incredibly feeble. , why don't you just post that you've banged 50,000+ girls, but that you can't remember any of their names, or what they looked like. All that you can tell us is that there probably is video on the internet, and that one of them might have had a birthday last year.

Just watch some old playoff games and you'll see, I guarantee. Or are you afraid I might just be right and spoil that illusion of a series win the Spurs stole?

[Obstructed_View]

I told you, the only one that readily comes to mind is the incident in the Heat/Pistons series last year. I know I've seen more, just can't remember the particular parties involved.

I know I've seen a shooting star before, but I can't remember where or when, get it?

Well here's a link to the Heat/Pistons series page on NBA.com. YOu can go through the game logs and find the incident. If there was an altercation there should have been technical fouls awarded, and there should be a corresponding news story about the commissioner deciding not to suspend the players involved.


http://www.nba.com/playoffs2006/series_detmia.html

[ChumpDumper]

Must I repeat myself again?

BECAUSE THE REST OF NBA DOESN'T PLAY BY THESE SAME RULE.

Prove they don't.

[NBAisDead]

REDUNDANCY ALERT!!!

PROVE IT.

I've got nothing to prove. 99.9% of basketball fans see it for what it is. It's just a matter of how long you Spurs fans wish to live this lie of a playoff win.

[Strike]

Just watch some old playoff games and you'll see, I guarantee. Or are you afraid I might just be right and spoil that illusion of a series win the Spurs stole?

Just run a USB cable from your brain to your computer, upload it and post the link, Johnny. So we may all enjoy the endless archive that is your mind.

[Strike]

I've got nothing to prove. 99.9% of basketball fans see it for what it is. It's just a matter of how long you Spurs fans wish to live this lie of a playoff win.

So what the are you doing here, troll?

[NBAisDead]

Well here's a link to the Heat/Pistons series page on NBA.com. YOu can go through the game logs and find the incident. If there was an altercation there should have been technical fouls awarded, and there should be a corresponding news story about the commissioner deciding not to suspend the players involved.


http://www.nba.com/playoffs2006/series_detmia.html

You won't find it there, because it wasn't a story. Stern made the rule a story by exploiting it.

[SpurCapita]

Just watch some old playoff games and you'll see, I guarantee. Or are you afraid I might just be right and spoil that illusion of a series win the Spurs stole?

I'm more afraid of Ray Bradbury stepping on my toe than I am of you being correct about anything.

[MaNuMaNiAc]

Thank you for spoiling the one thing other than sex that I enjoy in life

this explains a lot

[ChumpDumper]

I've got nothing to prove. 99.9% of basketball fans see it for what it is. It's just a matter of how long you Spurs fans wish to live this lie of a playoff win.

You have everything to prove.

All we have to do is say dude should've stayed near the bench.

[NBAisDead]

So what the are you doing here, troll?

I'm not a troll. As I said in another thread, I'm experimenting, trying to figure out just what kind of delusions of grandeur it takes for Spurs fans not to see the light.

[ChumpDumper]

You won't find it there, because it wasn't a story. Stern made the rule a story by exploiting it.

How and why did Stern "exploit" the rule?

[Obstructed_View]

I'm sorry for that misconception. Maybe my bad. I thought you would understand the point I was trying to make through exaggeration.

In my estimate, I've probably seen it 3 or 4 times over the last 3 playoffs. The point is, it's happened.

I don't know what point you are "trying" to make, but the point you are making is that you're willing to lie to win an argument, since you've done it repeatedly. You also are making the point that you will make an accusation without any facts, since you have no information with which to back up anything you've said.

If you are willing to lie to win an argument, is it such a stretch that you are willing to cheat for your team to win a basketball game?

[JustSpurs]

God! You're proving that you're nothing more than a whiney little troll.

Move along NBAisDead...

[ChumpDumper]

I'm not a troll. As I said in another thread, I'm experimenting, trying to figure out just what kind of delusions of grandeur it takes for Spurs fans not to see the light.

I am also a scientist who is finding out just how big a can be.

The results are quite impressive so far.

Thank you for being the perfect subject.

[NBAisDead]

How and why did Stern "exploit" the rule?

The how is obvious. The why is because Stern favores the Spurs.

[Obstructed_View]

Must I repeat myself again?

BECAUSE THE REST OF NBA DOESN'T PLAY BY THESE SAME RULE.

Yes, actually they do. Every single team plays by the same set of rules, and the leaving the bench rule is the simplest rule in the book because it states a specific mandatory punishment for breaking it, and outlines exactly the conditions that must be met in order for the punishment to be delivered. So why don't you think the Suns should have to play by this rule?

[NBAisDead]

I am also a scientist who is finding out just how big a can be.

The results are quite impressive so far.

Thank you for being the perfect subject.

I am taken aback with your rapier wit and repartees

[SpurCapita]

I'm not a troll. As I said in another thread, I'm experimenting, trying to figure out just what kind of delusions of grandeur it takes for Spurs fans not to see the light.

Fortunately, there are no delusions for the Spurs, because they actually achieve stuff. There's plenty of granduer to be found in 3, about to be 4, championchips.

[sabar]

I'm not a troll. As I said in another thread, I'm experimenting, trying to figure out just what kind of delusions of grandeur it takes for Spurs fans not to see the light.

Ever think that you're the one under the delusion? Let's see what it takes for a sunsfan to come up with this re ed conclusion.

1. Ignore rule
2. Ignore precedent set by rule in last 11 years
3. Dismiss Amare's IQ as causation
4. Dismiss Diaw's IQ as causation
5. Dismiss the assistant coaches as causation
6. Dismiss Nash exaggerating contact as causation
7. Believe the NBA is fixed
8. Believe Stern is the director of said fixing

Meanwhile, spursfan has this

1. Rulebook

And the proof is on us?
Please. The only delusional people are the suns fans and the media who saw their ratings drop and the last bastion of run-and-gun basketball die.

[polandprzem]

The how is obvious. The why is because Stern favores the Spurs.

Ratings going down

Yup Stern adores Spurs

[NBAisDead]

Fortunately, there are no delusions for the Spurs, because they actually achieve stuff. There's plenty of granduer to be found in 3, about to be 4, championchips.

Easy to "achieve" stuff when you got the commissioner of your league in your back pocket.

[Obstructed_View]

You won't find it there, because it wasn't a story. Stern made the rule a story by exploiting it.

But you can at least tell me where the altercation happened. Surely someone in the media reported that a player left the bench during an altercation, and that the league office had to look at it. This is the way it happens. Unless you are saying that it didn't happen that way, in which case you are lying to win an argument again, and it therefore wouldn't surprise me that you'd rather have your team cheat in order to win than lose fairly.

[ChumpDumper]

The how is obvious. The why is because Stern favores the Spurs.

No you never explained how.

And why does Stern favor the Spurs?

[NBAisDead]

Ratings going down

Yup Stern adores Spurs

Come on, everyone knows the truth. Stern favors the Spurs because they have donated millions over the years to help Israel.