Brent? Are you getting the message?

[whottt]

Last name: LivingInDenial
First name: PopNazi

[ChumpDumper]

Yeah and Pop's always done a good job of making players with big contracts attractive looking midseason aquisitions to other teams.

No cap space constraints this time around. That alone increases the possibilities tenfold.

I never said that, stupid.

So if you think he can recover by himself, why not show some respect and let him?

I am saying the same thing I have said throughout this thread.

You are saying the same conflicting things over and over again, I agree. You repe ion of them only proves the incongruity.

And I've seen you respect welfare recipients...so STFU Hedo.

No better alternative at the time. Now there is. Too bad you think so little of Barry that you want to consign him to Hedo hugs and welfare minutes. He's better than that and you said so, except when you denied it, then admitted it again, then denied it again.

[whottt]

No cap space constraints this time around.

Tell that to Tony Parker.

So if you think he can recover by himself, why not show some respect and let him?

STFU, stupid.

You are saying the same conflicting things over and over again, I agree. You repe ion of them only proves the incongruity.

No I'm not. Your ed interpretaions of what I said are what lead you into tail chasing endlessly...I just get a kick out of it and wonder if anyone else gets as big a kick out of it as I do.

No better alternative at the time. Now there is.

Um I'm sorry...I didn't realize you had no choice but to lean towards Hedo in Hedo>Manu.

You are statistical frontrunning trash lacking any insight that doesn't crammed down your throat by the LA Lakers.

Too bad you think so little of Barry that you want to consign him to Hedo hugs and welfare minutes.

To bad you'd rather lose at a greater pace and engage in endless self sucking rather than see the team play as well as it was before Pop got stupid.

The contradiction is you agreeing with me that we have, not had, a better record when Barry plays 20 minutes...and then turning around and acting like the way team is currently playing in the 4 games Barry has been yanked, half of them losses....are some kind of improvement worth defending.

He's better than that and you said so, except when you denied it, then admitted it again, then denied it again.

No, you're just stupid...Mr.Shouldn't. You seem to be too ing stupid to realize that minutes, undeserved or not, could greatly quicken his getting his act together and helping our team get back to where it was in the 18 games Barry was something other than team .

I like 15-3 better than 2-2...you call that welfare and I think you're stupid. I'm right Hedo...I don't have to eat to know I won't like it. Should we continue for another 8 pages?

[ChumpDumper]

Tell that to Tony Parker.

I will. Since it's true, is there anyone else you'd like me to tell?

You are statistical frontrunning trash

Says the man who used all kinds of stats to justify a qwhottta for Barry. Hypocrite.

The contradiction is you agreeing with me that we have, not had, a better record when Barry plays 20 minutes...and then turning around and acting like the way team is currently playing in the 4 games Barry has been yanked, half of them losses....are some kind of improvement worth defending.

You labor under the vomitously stupid assumption that Barry is the only reason for those victories and his absence is the only reason for those losses.

You seem to be too ing stupid to realize that minutes, undeserved or not, could greatly quicken his getting his act together and helping our team get back to where it was in the 18 games Barry was something other than team .

We all understand you welfare theory, hootie, although you can't even put a number to the amount of minutes it would take to satisfy your welfare qwhottta. It's nice that you can say Barry can do it by himself then turn around and say he's too weak to do it quickly without welfare.

I like 15-3 better than 2-2.

Yes, your sample size flaw and the Spurs inflated record has been addressed several times over.

Should we continue for another 8 pages?

That simply depends on how many times you want to change your story about Barry. Mine hasn't changed one iota -- Barry is good enough and smart enough to play out of this without your welfare minute qwhotttas. You agree with that except when you don't, and we understand your flip-flopping because there are 6 pages of it.

No need to continue.

[BronxCowboy]

Whottt, you're wasting your time with this guy. Just put him on your ignore list.

[Marcus Bryant]

It's not Gregg Popovich's fault that Brent Barry was apparently not required to play defense in the NBA prior to this season.

[timvp]

"I thought defense was something you put around your yard."

--ACTUAL Brent Barry Quote

[whottt]

Guess what? We are, and have been the #1 Defensive team in the NBA, even when Barry was getting 20 mins per game. In fact, we're doing worse now.

If we played bad D I could understand the point you guys are trying to make...but we don't. We have D coming out of our ears. We cannot get any better on D. We could not get any better on D last season. We can however, improve on the other side of the ball.

And again, if he's defensive stiff you guys claim, which is a claim I don't agree with, then use him in zone like every other team in the NBA does that has ty defensive players. And don't tell me we don't use a zone, we used one in the first half last night extensively, until we put Barry in the game.

[Marcus Bryant]

Why make the D worse for a guy who is stinking it up offensively? Especially when you have guys who are lighting it up such as Devin and Beno?

[whottt]

I dunno, why did we do it last night when Rasho left the game? To help Malik out?

And don't fall too in love with Beno...he's been riding the bench in our big losses and lead bowing quarters almost as much as Barry.

[Marcus Bryant]

Lame ing argument. Rose has certainly earned his spot in the rotation. Barry has not.

[ChumpDumper]

Malik had shown nothing in his first rotation to suggest he was going to play so badly in the second. All Barry showed you was he was destroyed.

[Guru of Nothing]

20 more days - 'til January

[whottt]

Lame ing argument. Rose has certainly earned his spot in the rotation. Barry has not.

Yeah well...some, saw that Malk could have still helped us last season, in fact did help us at times, like when Duncan was injured, earned spot or not.

But as long as Malik is getting his minutes you're happy, even when he's going 0-5 and getting 2 boards in 25 minutes, right MarcusVP?

[Marcus Bryant]

How is Barry going to help the Spurs when they have guys who are playing better offensively and defensively? What specific aspect of the game is Barry going to improve upon?

[ChumpDumper]

Is Barry a destroyed player?

Yes.

Is a destroyed player the best option to have out on the floor, when you have 5 guys available who are the complete oppos e of destroyed?

No.

[whottt]

How is Barry going to help the Spurs when they have guys who are playing better offensively and defensively? What specific aspect of the game is Barry going to improve upon?

Because he doesn't take bad shots, make bad passes, miss half his FT's every other night, stupidly turn the ball over etc...stuff like that...see the final 48 seconds of the Houston game. It wasn't all TMac.

[Marcus Bryant]

The argument for Malik last season was that the Spurs needed to be more physical in the paint. With Barry what is the argument? That the Spurs need better shooting from the wing? That the Spurs need better playmaking (and shooting) from the backup point? Sorry, that's not a problem right now.

[Marcus Bryant]

Oh good. One play.

As for bad shots, Barry's taken more bad shots than Devin and Beno combined. He's also missed a bit too many of the wide open variety.

But, I know, he's "surprisingly athletic"...

[whottt]

Oh good. One play.

As for bad shots, Barry's taken more bad shots than Devin and Beno combined. He's also missed a bit too many of the wide open variety.

But, I know, he's "surprisingly athletic"...

That's not true...he's not hitting his shots, but that doesn't mean he's taking bad ones.

[ChumpDumper]

Our young players are going to play these minutes sooner or later. We are developing a rookie and young players while playing championship level basketball. Their development takes precedence over giving welfare minutes to a guy who is going to end up earning the minutes anyway.

[whottt]

Malik had shown nothing in his first rotation to suggest he was going to play so badly in the second. All Barry showed you was he was destroyed.

Coming from the "it" who trashed Malk even this past summer...STFU, welfare recipient leaner towardser..er.

[whottt]

Is Barry a destroyed player?


Quote:
Originally Posted by whottt




Yes.


Quote:
Originally Posted by ChumpDumper




Is a destroyed player the best option to have out on the floor, when you have 5 guys available who are the complete oppos e of destroyed?


Quote:
Originally Posted by whottt




No.

No, you're just stupid...Mr.Shouldn't. You seem to be too ing stupid to realize that minutes, undeserved or not, could greatly quicken his getting his act together and helping our team get back to where it was in the 18 games Barry was something other than team .

[ChumpDumper]

Coming from the "it" who trashed Malk even this past summer.

I said play him or trade him.

And I said I believe he could play like he did before and get back in the rotation.

Just like I believe Barry can.

Eventually it will come down to play Barry or trade him. If it turns out there is no reason to play him then he should be traded. You agree with that.

Until you don't.

I give it half a page.

[ChumpDumper]

No, you're just stupid...Mr.Shouldn't. You seem to be too ing stupid to realize that minutes, undeserved or not, could greatly quicken his getting his act together

No need to rehash the welfare plan, especially if you won't specify your qwhottta.