LA didn't need to double TD when they had Malone. Duh.
At least try next time, ok?
He's a last second shot specialist, not last minute.
He didn't? I didn't see the Laker double teams with Malone causing 9 point outings and 10 turn over games by Duncan like they did when Horry was part of them.Horry never did as good a job on Duncan as Malone did. Never.
He is now, he's also got more rings. He's also better than Wilt now. I fully expect Malik to be ahead of Malone in the rotation when it is all said and done..otherwise I'd be dead set against signing Malone.Malik is good but he isn't that good.
Malik will do a better job than Malone of banging so if that is why you want Malone you are barking up the wrong tree.
Malone has one semi-redeeming skill left...he can probably still throw that elbow and he will probably be more inclined to do so than ever before...I'm just hoping he uses it for an act of good for once and ends Howard's season.
LA didn't need to double TD when they had Malone. Duh.
At least try next time, ok?
Ok that's just dumb. Horry is certainly known for hitting big shots late in games, not just at the last second.He's a last second shot specialist, not last minute.
Malik does not have the game a 57 year old Karl Malone does.
"At this point in his career Malone is a hired gun, much like Elie, Kersey, Porter, and Horry. They were brought in to fill a role and that would be the case with Malone."
And the Spurs are the guys in the West Texas town who hear that the big guns are coming...
San Antonio has an inferiority complex - I'm not talking just the Spurs, I'm talking the average SA citizen. These people have no idea how really great they are - they bow, genuflect, scrape and whisper misereres at the slightest provocation.
Well, guess what? San Antonio is happening!
For some reason, we aren't content with filled venues for our sporting events, we want what the Lakers have.
How does having film stars on the sidelines make for a better team?
If you mean more than 2 championships, you're right.we want what the Lakers have.
Spurs can win it all without Malone.
On the other hand, I don't think adding him will hurt, and it might help. People forget, or don't want to admit, that a big part of the reason why the Spurs lost last year was his D on Duncan. And a big part of why the Lakers lost to the Pistons was because he ran out of steam in that series. So, if he wants to come here, and he can put in 10-15 minutes a game, play tough D, hit some shots, why not let him? I see him filling a Kevin Willis role, if anything, and taking minutes from Tony Massenburg, and he's definitely better than him. But I don't think Malik or Horry will lose minutes, as long as they're playing well.
exactly.
screw Malone, we want Scola
haha lakergod is a ing joke.
Laker, how are the LAkers doing this season, i didn't really notice them.
that and he had a knee that couldnt take the pounding anymore, it needed surgery.because he ran out of steam in that series
He never played in the Finals last year I dont believe.
I would rather see Malone win a ring with the Lakers than the Spurs win one with him. If he signs in SA I'll be cheering for a first round upset at the hands of Kobe, unless he happens to get injured.
If he gets hurt for good in the first round of the playoffs I'll cheer for the Spurs to win the le so that he gets the ultimate *-ring... and only then will I cheer a Spurs team with Malone on it.
Any success a Spurs team has with Malone on it is worthless to me as a fan.
He had 4 points on 2-9 shooting with 11 boards in 44 minutes in game 1.He never played in the Finals last year I dont believe.
I'll always support the Spurs.
I'll never support Malone the individual.
so sign him to a one year, grit your teeth during the championship celebration, and then axe him and bring in scola next year.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)