More lies.
That isn't a prediction dip , it also isn't a fact.
Oh right -- now you're trying to say other people's predictions are facts.
You flip-flop so much it's hard to keep track. Do you have a notebook to tell you how many times you changed what you said?
More lies.
That isn't a prediction dip , it also isn't a fact.
I so don't believe anything I post that I've offered to bet money on what I post, yet no one accepted. Who really doesn't believe what they post?
Been a rough week for you and your Dear Leader.
muh bets
Do you realize how stupid you look right now?
Oh, sorry -- I violated your "no questions" rule becausemuh bets
![]()
The opinion of a liar and coward hold no weight.
projection
Yours also hold no weight since you change and deny them so often.
Forcing your tail between your legs and watching the FBI run from the dossier has been tons of fun to watch. Been a great week for me and looks to be an excellent month as the OIG starts reporting to congress on the 15th.
You've been caught lying 3 times just this morning.
Run? They went over Nunes head yesterday and you said all about it.Not good enough to make any predictions about convictions for unlawful exonerations, sundance.Been a great week for me and looks to be an excellent month as the OIG starts reporting to congress on the 15th.
muh non-prediction prediction fact bets
![]()
unlawful exoneration
Republicans funded the Steele dossier
What's an unlawful exoneration?
HOW DARE COMEY HAVE PROOF OF HIS MEETINGS WITH DEAR LEADER! IT MIGHT LEAD TO UNLAWFUL EXONERATION!
What's an unlawful exoneration?
Proof of his meetings isn't illegal, giving the classified memo to someone without clearance is. You are embarrassing yourself just stop already.
I'll answer that as soon as you answer my question you keep dodging. Who funded the Steele dossier, Republicans or Democrats?
This bit got debunked a while back. Comey's memos don't qualify under the statutes, or any NDA.
What's an unlawful exoneration?
What was classified and what was the classification?
Or do questions still scare you?
Including that question.
Pussy.
Cir stantial ad hominem
Funding source is irrelevant to underlying truth of any claims in them.
I told your dumb ass to look this up, but you can't seem to pass up an opportunity to play in your own waste.
Fallacy occurs when someone uses unsound reasoning to support a claim or argument. Cir stantial Ad Hominem occurs when someone attacks a claim by saying that the person making the claim is only making it because it's in his/her interest or because of his/her cir stances.
Correct critical thinking answer to your question is: Doesn't really matter.
Is the do ent false because of who paid for it?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)