Reply With Quote
Dictator Trudeau sounds exactly like American Democrats. Their logic behind gun control will never stop. They will continue to push to get rid of all guns.
DMC reading comprehension failures again? No way
Dictator Trudeau sounds exactly like American Democrats. Their logic behind gun control will never stop. They will continue to push to get rid of all guns.
Todays common sense gun control was yesterday's slippery slope. They'll lie every step of the way.
How much time have you spent in Canada?
How many guns do you have at work?
Its an uphill battle. I know what you mean.
Im still waiting for Howitzers and grenades to be legal for self defense the way Texas is run.
Military "style"
IH35 goes North.
It also goes South.
I take 37 south to the coast for most of the trip.
No, I said, in snarky tone, let's send them to federal prison. Then you said and I quote: "No one considers a military base to be a federal prison yet it has the same provisions I listed".
When I said we don't populate military bases with civilians, you countered with military bases that were transferred to civilians as some sort of comeback (that no longer have the provisions you listed, which I pointed out, and makes it moot), followed by you making up a claim about what bases look like, something I have no clue where you got it from.
There aren't two lanes here, this has never been about looks, this is about where you send your kids to school. You might be fine with sending them to full blown military bases, but I'm pretty certain you're in a minority, we don't have enough bases for that, and frankly, it's not a solution to the underlying problem (which is the shooters).
I'm answering the questions straight up, you just don't like the answers, mostly because the question has nothing to do with the topic at hand.
I don't live fearing for my life, and I don't own any guns (though I grew up around them). If life ends tomorrow, then I had a good life. It's really something I don't give a lot of thought to, because I know it's inevitable, and rather spend my time on something else.
I might/might not be representative of the population at large, I don't know, and it doesn't really matter, as we're discussing children in school, which has nothing to do with me or my home.
I don't have children. But if I did, I sure as wouldn't want to take him to a military base for school. If those are the options, I'll take legislation 10 out of 10 times. But again, that's just me.
You're being snarky again. I didn't suggest you take your kids to a military base, however currently there are 161 public schools that operate on military installations across the United States.
You seem offended by any suggestion other than gun control. Just say so upfront and save us both the trouble, or simply ignore talk outside that realm.
Military "style"
Now go on about how a "machine gun" is only an automatic weapon
Now go on about how a "machine gun" is only an automatic weapon
"Well-regulated in the 18th century tended to be something like well-organized, well-armed,
well-disciplined," says Rakove. "It didn't mean 'regulation' in the sense that we use it now, in
that it's not about the regulatory state. There's been nuance there. It means the militia was
in an effective shape to fight."
In other words, it didn't mean the state was controlling the militia in a certain way, but rather
that the militia was prepared to do its duty.
https://cons utioncenter.org/image...CNN_Aug_11.pdf
So you're part of a militia ready to do your duty?
all schools
half-hearted conservatives won't protect family values, y'all know what to do, lone wolves!
tbh unless you can build a functioning semi automatic rifle out of nothing but scrap metal you probably arent qualified to opine on gun control policy
I disagree. As long as you know that a 22lr sticks in the lung and a 9mm blows the lung totally out of the body then you are totally qualified on gun control policy.
so much for blaming it on a teacher
seems there will be many closed coffins
some NRA asshole, up to his eyeballs in fantasy, claims hammers kill more people than guns
Of course you did. If we're bringing military-base security into schools, then we're effectively turning schools into military-bases. That's just not an integral solution to this problem, IMO.
It's the other way around. I have no problem with comprehensive proposals that include increased security (but don't turn schools into bootcamps), just as long as viable gun control is part of that discussion.
But if we're going to leave any kind of gun control out, then it's not comprehensive, and it's just another bandaid to kick the can forward until the next incident.
But DMC still needs his AR15 to kill the government that killed the Uvlade shooter.
Look I'm not a huge fan of Trudeau, but common sense is common sense. At one point in my profession I had to carry a handgun and be trained to use it. Now, in order for me to attain the ability to carry, there's a ton of rules and regulation. Luckily for work they took care of that aspect. Now as a civilian, it was already very difficult to own a handgun, not impossible mind you. Still, I welcome these new rules. Get a shotgun if you need to protect your home.
I admire your patience...
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
