It's amazing watching deranged partisans try to debate law on the level of someone like vy65 with complete obliviousness to how stupid he's making them look. But I am glad he took the time, because I learned some things too.
Don't need one tbh. Haven't for awhile.
It's amazing watching deranged partisans try to debate law on the level of someone like vy65 with complete obliviousness to how stupid he's making them look. But I am glad he took the time, because I learned some things too.
But, WHY would you NOT?
they can have it right after trump releases his taxes
BECAUSE they don't NEED to.
Also makes it easy to troll Trump into multiple obstruction articles of impeachment.
But stamp your feet about a nonissue. It's really all you got.
I kind of wish they would just to call his bluff. But he'll still refuse and obstruct.
vy drives the team 98 yards down the field, elnono comes in and vultures the 1 yard touchdown tbh...
No real answer yet
Why have a vote when the rules don't call for one?
Real answers only, please.
Pence aiming to release records of his own Ukraine calls
https://apnews.com/e48c28cf0625430fa829431df3872ead
Exclusive poll: Most think Trump will be impeached and win 2020 reelection
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/w...020-reelection
I took a bunch of con law from some really preeminent guys. It’s frustrating seeing the level of thought and intellect that they put into their work and then seeing what passes as legal scholarship in the mainstream. I’m sure SR21 can relate.
It’s like that Wittgenstein quote
We have an exclusive poll that only we can produce because we did not want to include anyone but special people.
Not just anyone can poll like we can because we can exclude better than anyone else. Furthermore, you can’t get numbers like these just anywhere.
Cool.
.... les for fun.
pepperdine is a pretty right leaning ins ution, but my profs did a pretty good job of just sticking to the case law when teaching it. for whatever reason, pepperdine broke up con law such that the first amendment was its own course, so we spent a full semester on that. i had the same prof for both, and he couldnt go a few days without reminding the class of back when he clerked for justice rehnquist
but that emphasis on the first amendment is prob why i get so frustrated when i read all these articles about freedom of speech in the private sector
i think one of the misconceptions is that in law school you just spend your time memorizing laws/statutes/codes
Trump is freaking out so much about impeachment he’s calling Mitch McConnell 3 times a day
President Donald Trump and his team of White House advisers are starting to panic about whether Republicans will falter when it comes to impeachment.
Trump has claimed that he welcomes impeachment,
but his Twitter account shows another story.
With his tweets and retweets more than doubling since the inquiry was announced,
Trump appears to be spiraling into a meltdown with each new revelation.
Trump has been lashing out at Republicans senators he thinks might be disloyal, something he’s done since the beginning of taking office. Now, however, he needs them.
“Trump’s son-in-law and senior adviser Jared Kushner is seen by many aides as leading the impeachment strategy efforts.
, though other officials said much of the response will be left to
‘Jay and Trey,’ a reference to Gowdy and Jay Sekulow, members of the outside legal team.”
https://www.rawstory.com/2019/10/trump-is-freaking-out-so-much-about-impeachment-hes-calling-mitch-mcconnell-3-times-a-day/
He freaks out and melts down daily pretty well for a 70 something yo child.
I wish he would just leave, but I really want the red team members backing this lunatic held to accounting for wtf they were thinking while backing him.
Let me rephrase. Why would it be advantageous for Pelosi to NOT have a vote?
tbh, what vy did is educational and appreciated, and can be a thankless job here.
There's a number of political downsides to having the vote (chief among them the distraction once this gets approved along party lines), but more importantly, there's just simply nothing to gain for Pelosi by having it.
reminds me of the post-2013 finals upstairs tbh, with bruno/chinook calmly talking about the salary cap situation, etc, while the trolls like greatyacht and skull-1 were just running around flinging everywhere
I just said it allows them to pile on the obstruction articles.
Also since you guys have been told to stamp your little feet about it, a delay can provide cover for moderate Democrats. They can be the loudest about wanting a vote and take credit when it finally happens.
Arguably, there's nothing more contemptuous to the Cons ution than the arguments in that letter. It should probably go down in history as how you royally take a on the Cons ution.
What did he do? Post some legal argument in tortured english?
He patiently explained how impeachment works, what precedent is there for it, dispelled myths, and backed it up with case law.
Taking the time to educate people is commendable, IMO.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)