I don't favor terms limits either. I just heard about Tim Cox's effort to replace career politicians with citizen representatives. He's got an uphill battle but it is an interesting approach...
But if it's TOTALLY free, then there's problems too, right? Monopolies and whatnot? So you feel that some control is ok, you just think it's alot less than liberals do.
I'm not sure which has more forces acting on it; I believe both contain so many numerous force that it's nigh impossible to fully predict something. At best, scientists/economists can guess ratios of possibility (think quantum physics).
My children's future? heck, what about mine? You forget that not all of us are as old as you WC.
Anyways, like I said, I can see the argument from both sides. Might it not have been better to let the ans fall? Possibly, but at risk of another Depression, which would have wiped out a great deal of wealth. Agreed? I can see why people did not want to eliminate that wealth, and I can see why some asked why we keep propping up these idiots who got us into this mess.
I don't favor terms limits either. I just heard about Tim Cox's effort to replace career politicians with citizen representatives. He's got an uphill battle but it is an interesting approach...
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)