Reply With Quote
The fact their other big men suck so much that Matt Bonner gets consistent PT is a problem.
And even then, the Spurs having two "big men", Bonner and DeFat who are both atrocious defenders getting significant minutes leads to "matchup problems."
Not sure what's funny. They destroyed them the previous year in the playoffs and had the best record in the West going into the playoffs.
The fact their other big men suck so much that Matt Bonner gets consistent PT is a problem.
And even then, the Spurs having two "big men", Bonner and DeFat who are both atrocious defenders getting significant minutes leads to "matchup problems."
Just imagine how bad it would've been if Memphis had arguably their best player. Sweep maybe?
I could see where you would ask me to do the math, considering it is very hard to do, due to the Spurs best player playing with a broken arm.
Is Dirk Nowitzki a good defender? Is he even an average defender?
Memphis' best player was also out with injury.
Is this the same best player who was injured during the 2008, 2009 and 2010 playoffs?
At which point do you realize Ginobili being injured during the playoffs isnt bad timing or coincidence but rather something they should actually anticipate as it's an annual occurrence?
.sffoyalp eht otni gniog tseW eht ni drocer tseb eht dah dna sffoyalp eht ni raey suoiverp eht meht deyortsed yehT .ynnuf s'tahw erus toN
^what i actually see when i read a joshtheboss post
That is funny. I could have sworn I saw Zach Randolph destroying McDyess in that series.
He's a better defender than DeFat or Bonner, and the Mavs also had a true center between Chandler and Haywood on the floor at all times last year. The Spurs frequently d small ball lineups last year.
Gay >>>>>> Manu
That's fine, when they beat my team at full strength, I'll be happy to congratulate them.
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahaha
I didn't put 2nd best in white font or anything. Since you are so caught up in matchups, you should probably realize how bad of a matchup ZBO is for SA. But then again, if they had their best player in Rudy Gay, it would've been an even shorter series.
Your team at full strength is a 2nd round exit at best you ing do .
No, he isn't. Nowitzki is a turnstile defensively. Easily the worst superstar defender that I've ever seen, including Nash.
You didn't answer my question but I see this is slowly becoming an, "I was trolling all along and my extremely re ed opinions weren't serious," episode.
With the Spurs winning in 5 games, even with Manu hurt.
This guy is like an untrollable level of stupid, he's too stupid to even realize that he's an idiot. Creating some sort of a false reality for him. Guys kewni isn't trolling at all, he's a walking lesson in psychology.
Anyway, my rankings:
West:
OKC (Durant/West/Harden is a nice combo)
Mavs (Dirk. But Odom is terrible. VC experiment working, but Terry is too irregular)
Spurs (Parker is playing better, Pop is awesome, but needs healthy Manu)
Lakers (Kobe/Gasol/Bynum, but not PG, and Artest will snap soon, so...)
Clippers (they should start clicking soon)
Maybe Grizzlies, if they make a good run.
East:
Heat (Lebron)
Bulls (lots of road wins)
Sixers (team is pretty good)
Orlando (Howard)
Hawks (because the rest are terrible)
Maybe Knicks, if Melo/Amare/Lin can work together.
Whatever you want to try to say to try to subvert my dominance over you. The fact will remain: Me > you, in NBA knowledge. Me > you, in life.
If you've been trying to tell the forum who you are, this post has solidified it.
Sixers aren't going anywhere w/o superstars. They're a nice story, but that's all.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions