Are you really that stupid? Prosecutors don't post their secret deals with snitches on the internet.
you ing idiot...I just noticed the LOL judge. Are you not aware that a prosecutor can't offer a plea deal unless the judge approves of the deal?
Reduced charge for the related crime......most of the time done because the prosecution realizes they don't have a great deal of evidence to work with.
Just one link where a murder charge was dropped by a prosecutor (lol judge) in exchange for ratting out a drug supplier will suffice, thanks.
Are you really that stupid? Prosecutors don't post their secret deals with snitches on the internet.
you ing idiot...I just noticed the LOL judge. Are you not aware that a prosecutor can't offer a plea deal unless the judge approves of the deal?
Last edited by CosmicCowboy; 04-05-2012 at 03:10 PM.
A lot of what they did do is in the police report. Many also seem to forget that he was taken to the police department and interviewed for several hours that same night.
I knew at least a dozen guys in high school / college that got busted for dealing because someone else got popped for something and then rolled on them to get off. Some of them even played the same game and rolled on someone higher up the food chain. To think this doesn't happen at higher levels of crime is ridiculous.
If it's so secret, then how do you know it happens all the time?
You don't because you don't know what the you are talking about.
You're an idiot.
Sorry, but to think that this case is an analog to the other one is just ing foolish.
No, I am concerned about justice and gathering evidence at the scene and the fact that a young 17 year old kid is dead is the real tragedy. Getting shot dead when all he was doing was walking home. Allegedly.
I concur.
I get that you feel the judge is really in on the dismissal of the case when it's really nothing more than a formality.
I already knew you didn't know how it works. There's no need for you to continue to prove your ignorance, but feel free to do so.![]()
isn't there a supreme court case that says secret deals violate due process, confrontation clause, etc? Isn't that why the ex-DA out of Williamson County is in trouble now? Because he failed to disclose his plea deal with a defendant turned state's witness? I think CC is in way over his pay grade on this one.
I'm glad you're so concerned. It's amusing.
I know about all that. But forensic testing was done as far as I've read.
I'm glad you find someone's death amusing.
No, you dont concur. You don't have any clue what you're talking about and I sometimes hate being on the same side of an issue as you. You just parrot.
I'm sure that's what you're taking from our discussion. I expect nothing more from someone so simple.
Oh STFU and get off your damn high horse. I know exactly what I am talking and stop acting like your don't stink.
Hey, you are the one that finds things amusing.
My smells great, thanks.
I can't believe you are so determined to argue against every ing thing I say that you would actually try to take the position that the use of snitches and reducing sentences for usable information isn't common at all levels of law enforcement.
Oh, and if MIG thinks I like being on the same side as his he is wrong. Dead wrong.
True enough. I've seen that guy in a hoodie. He's lucky to be alive.
I know for a fact it's done all the time because I was personally involved in a case with the ATF/FBI about ten years ago.
Last edited by CosmicCowboy; 04-05-2012 at 03:39 PM.
I've been busted before and damn right I was asked to spill the beans on others.
Fair enough.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)