So his punishment was increased based on something other than his violation of the CRA.
Maybe that seems like a small point, and it may not have been enough for me to publicly object.
This thread, however, crosses the line.
Cully violated the CRA- no doubt.
The EC has the authority to enforce the CRA- no doubt.
But this thread?
A single member of the EC offers his services to remove sanctions for violations of the CRA. And what does he ask in return?
Promises that there will be no further violations of the CRA? No
A statement of contrition for his past violations of the CRA? No
He asks for a public accounting of why Cully welched. What the does that have to do with Cully's violations of the CRA? It's just a blatant attempt to get some sort of public genuflection by Cully in his direction. And that is bullying, plain and simple.
So, if he has violated the CRA, get a clean vote passed, get Kori to approve, and implement the punishment. Plain and simple.