There is an actual guide for gun control advocates to follow when debating.

[scroteface]

I said I didn't think I could find one online. It's simply stupid to think such do ents simply don't exist with all the gun lobbyists out there.

well go ahead prove they exist. we can already prove the reverse..

[ChumpDumper]

well go ahead prove they exist. we can already prove the reverse..

Don't you have a Jew to blame for your life right now?

[scroteface]

Don't you have a Jew to blame for your life right now?

i think it's more like, don't you have a German to blame for the plight of your ancestors right now? remember teh septillion

[ChumpDumper]

i think it's more like, don't you have a German to blame for the plight of your ancestors right now? remember teh septillion

Uh, no. What are you talking about?

[scroteface]

Uh, no. What are you talking about?

You're Jewish.

[ChumpDumper]

You're Jewish.

Oh, that's what you think.

lol

Life's gotta be terribly frustrating for you.

[scroteface]

nope

[ChumpDumper]

Well, it isn't difficult for you to find someone to blame for your problems, for sure.

[scroteface]

no problems other than faces like you and your terrible political opinions

[ChumpDumper]

Nice. Why don't you threaten me again, tough guy?

[TSA]

I already said I didn't think I could find one online. It's simply stupid to think such do ents simply don't and could never exist with all the gun lobbyists out there.

It's simply stupid to believe these do ents wouldn't be available online, considering there are more gun lobbyists.

[ChumpDumper]

It's simply stupid to believe these do ents wouldn't be available online, considering there are more gun lobbyists.

Not really. I'm sure there is more than one for the gun control side.

[TSA]

Not really. I'm sure there is more than one for the gun control side.

Again, find one that compares.

[ChumpDumper]

Again, find one that compares.

Again, can you not read?

[TSA]

Again, can you not read?

Can you not find one?

Yes or no.

[ChumpDumper]

Can you not find one?

Yes or no.

Asked and answered, but if you want to argue that the one you linked is the only one in existence, that's OK.

[TSA]

Asked and answered, but if you want to argue that the one you linked is the only one in existence, that's OK.

Nah I'm good. Not going down your other route.

[Th'Pusher]

Originally Posted by TSA


Are you claiming it won't? Do you trust your government? Do you think your government will not abuse it's powers?

lmfao "registry doesn't lead to confiscation"

seriously, what are you a naive 2 year old?

DMC doesn't want to jump in the confiscation clown car with these two tea potty patriots?

[DMC]

Not true. There exists a law against having a government database for registering guns. That's not the same as saying "records of guns". You can find all kinds of gun records on the ATF database, just nothing that registers a particular gun with the purchaser. That's all done on paper for a reason that you wouldn't get since the only freedom you seem to value is the one to run your mouth.

thank you for providing an example of the type of laws that the gun industry successfully lobbied for and had enacted to suppress the type of data necessary to perform the research necessary to make better informed policy decisions.

Now explain why said law is necessary. I'll see you at the bottom of the slippery slope where you claim a national registry will lead to confiscation.

I never said it was necessary. I said "for a reason".

A reason is for a basis or a cause. In this case, the basis is the statute I showed you.

Necessary means essential, indispensable. Were I to presuppose an outcome, I'd then be able to call an action or law necessary.

If you have a problem with the USC, take it up with your congressman.

Can you see the difference? Now would you like to even attempt some integrity with your responses or are you going to continue looking like a tool?

[DMC]

DMC doesn't want to jump in the confiscation clown car with these two tea potty patriots?

I have no reason to go beyond the present. Presently laws exist that prohibit a national gun registry. That's really all that matters.

[boutons_deux]

"Presently laws exist that prohibit a national gun registry"

and it's a totally bull law, NRA promoted for totally bull reasons, suckering gun fellators into believing their bull to be true!

[TSA]

DMC doesn't want to jump in the confiscation clown car with these two tea potty patriots?

Do you think your government would not abuse the powers of a National gun registry, yes or no.

[Th'Pusher]

I never said it was necessary. I said "for a reason".

A reason is for a basis or a cause. In this case, the basis is the statute I showed you.

Necessary means essential, indispensable. Were I to presuppose an outcome, I'd then be able to call an action or law necessary.

If you have a problem with the USC, take it up with your congressman.

Can you see the difference? Now would you like to even attempt some integrity with your responses or are you going to continue looking like a tool?

To Boutons You said, "that's all done on paper for a reason you wouldn't get..." What specifically is the reason that boutons would not get since he is only concerned about the freedom to run his mouth? Are you suggesting Boutons is incabable of understanding that a law simply exists?

Ive seen your schtick. You'll say anything to engage in an Internet debate that amounts to nothing.

You'd prefer to dissect my language as opposed to offering your view on the matter.

I wouldn't have climbed into that clown-car with those two bags either.

[TSA]

Do you think your government would not abuse the powers of a National gun registry, yes or no.

Too difficult to answer?

[Th'Pusher]

Do you think your government would not abuse the powers of a National gun registry, yes or no.

Safegards can be enacted to prevent govt abuse of the data. The potential benefits far outweigh the potential abuses IMO.

I, in no way think it would lead to govt confiscation...not without an outright appeal of the second amendment which is obviously not going to happen.