NBA: Boris 'The Animal' Diaw or David Lee 2.0

[FkLA]

so what

lol smh tech

[DAF86]

Lee doesn't shoot the three, so imo, Brooks would probably go taller to compensate.

I already said this.

So the team wouldn't be able to exploit a clear disadvantage becuase of Lee's inability to hit threes? It seems like the guy that can would be more valuable, tbh.

[Blake]

So the team wouldn't be able to exploit a clear disadvantage becuase of Lee's inability to hit threes? It seems like the guy that can would be more valuable, tbh.

Maybe maybe not. What does that have to do with Diaw> Lee?

Is Bonner now more valuable than Lee?

[Blake]

lol smh tech

Rings hollow in a thread led Diaw> Lee

smh smh utsa

[FkLA]

Lee doesn't shoot the three, so imo, Brooks would probably go taller to compensate.

I already said this.

lol probably

Diaw's ability to shoot the three wasnt the reason OKC went small, re . Youre not very good at this understanding basketball thing are you ?

Is Bonner now more valuable than Lee?

According to your +/- you brought up to justify Lee being better than Diaw, he is.

[m>s]

got fight!

[unleashbaynes]

Great thread until the s started with their little slap fight.

[Blake]

lol probably

Diaw's ability to shoot the three wasnt the reason OKC went small, re . Youre not very good at this understanding basketball thing are you ?

I listed it as a reason. I didn't say it was the reason. Your understanding of English es no good.

According to your +/- you brought up to justify Lee being better than Diaw, he is.

I think +/- is a nice stat to add to all the other stats Lee dominates Diaw in.

But keep relying on your eye test. That seems to have worked out well.

Smh utsa

[Aztecfan03]

That stat reflects exactly what FkLA and I were saying: That when Diaw post ups he tends to have a higher success% than Duncan. Of course Duncan post ups more often than Diaw (I don't know if that much often) and against stiffer compe ion but we never argued other wise.

The eye test tells me that Diaw is even better than Duncan (at this point of his career) in the low block. I don't know if the stats back that up.

You argued that Diaw is better in the low block. quit spinning.

[Aztecfan03]

Diaw- s . I like Diaw, but come on...

[FkLA]

I listed it as a reason. I didn't say it was the reason. Your understanding of English es no good.

Oh ok, so iyo what was the main reason why Brooks went small?

I think +/- is a nice stat to add to all the other stats Lee dominates Diaw in.

But keep relying on your eye test. That seems to have worked out well.

Smh utsa

Lee's stats are cuter than Diaws. Inflated by where he plays and his role there. Also loses value when you consider his atrocious D. But I can see how a gullible person that doesn't understand bball could fail to see that.

Scoreboard says my eye test is fine. So does Diaws points per post up. Thanks for the props.

[FkLA]

Diaw- s . I like Diaw, but come on...

Yeah, how dare anyone compare him to that monster David Lee.

[ElNono]

If Diaw wins Finals MVP....

[DAF86]

You argued that Diaw is better in the low block. quit spinning.

FkLA explained it better later on a post. What I was trying to say is that everytime Boris posts ups I see that he has more success than Duncan. We all know that Duncan always post ups against the best post up defender on the other team so I didn't feel like I had to explain that but seeing that there are many re s here I guess I should have done it.

[Blake]

Oh ok, so iyo what was the main reason why Brooks went small?

Main reasons being that they wanted a fast paced game and their bigs suck at scoring

Lee's stats are cuter than Diaws. Inflated by where he plays and his role there. Also loses value when you consider his atrocious D. But I can see how a gullible person that doesn't understand bball could fail to see that.

Scoreboard says my eye test is fine. So does Diaws points per post up. Thanks for the props.

What scoreboard?

Lol eye test arguments

Smh utsa

[Blake]

Oh ok, so iyo what was the main reason why Brooks went small?

Main reasons being that they wanted a fast paced game and their bigs suck at scoring

Lee's stats are cuter than Diaws. Inflated by where he plays and his role there. Also loses value when you consider his atrocious D. But I can see how a gullible person that doesn't understand bball could fail to see that.

Scoreboard says my eye test is fine. So does Diaws points per post up. Thanks for the props.

What scoreboard?

Lol eye test arguments

Smh utsa

[Blake]

If Diaw wins Finals MVP....

This thread will get stickied

[FkLA]

Main reasons being that they wanted a fast paced game and their bigs suck at scoring

Exactly re . How does Lee's inability to shoot the three change that or force Brooks to go big? If anything Lee would've had to have been subbed out or moved to center, he can't play the small ball 4 like Diaw can.

What scoreboard?

Lol eye test arguments

Smh utsa

The 44-8 scoreboard.

lol I dont watch the guy play but his stats are cute argument

smh Tech

[Clipper Nation]

This thread will get stickied

More like it would get sticky from all the that FkLA and DAF would be producing

[Franklin]

now is it safe to say Diaw > Lee?

[DAF86]

+30 for the Diawnimal.

[Blake]

Exactly re . How does Lee's inability to shoot the three change that or force Brooks to go big? If anything Lee would've had to have been subbed out or moved to center, he can't play the small ball 4 like Diaw can.



The 44-8 scoreboard.

lol I dont watch the guy play but his stats are cute argument

smh Tech

Lol "Lee would have had to been subbed out."

[Blake]

More like it would get sticky from all the that FkLA and DAF would be producing

The semen splatter would spill over into other threads.

But Boris ain't winning mvp so it's a moot point.

Smh utsa

[Blake]

lol I dont watch the guy play

lol

Smh utsa

[FkLA]

Lol "Lee would have had to been subbed out."

Or moved over to center. Unless you think he is a capable small ball 4 against the line-up Brooks was throwing out there?