After a cursory look, the similar pictures used are actually more heavily cropped and edited on the conservative site, It's weird that random tweeters are so hot to brand vidcaps from CNN or USA Today after they put a couple of MSPaint lines on it.
I don't see it as an indictment on the information being presented, but who's to say everything they did was original research anyway?
I can't see this as anything but an attempt to distract from any real issues that might arise from the blog and or twitter feed.
I didn't say you condemned his viewpoint. You tried to discredit him because he had that viewpoint.
Of course they can exist. One can be more accurate than the other, but they can certainly both exist.The two links can not co-exist factually. I've you'd read both that would be fairly obvious.
So I will ask you again, what is factually wrong with the twitter feed you have been condemning all night?
agreed. does this make me a semen shield? I really dont want to be branded as a semen shield.
than what does that say for Shaun King and his "research"?
It says the same thing it does for "research" of the person or persons who refuse to use their names on your blog.
I discredited FuzzyLumpkins for citing a hack like Shaun King and trying to pass it off as some sort of fact.
No different than when he made the claim Michael Brown was shot in the back and then killed execution style on his knees with his hands up surrendering, only to have that claim blow up in his face after then witnesses all changed their stories once the autopsy came out.
No different than when he cited an autopsy report done by a man who was hired by the Brown family that was unlicensed and unqualified to do any sort of official autopsy, let alone get on National news and tell his results to millions of viewers.
Had anyone here posted the link to the conservative treehouse it would have been shredded, Shaun King is no different, aside from being a whiny pussy on his twitter account.
So you have still not said one thing about the actual veracity of the content compared to that of the blog.
The tangent continues.
My tangent has remained consistent despite your attempts to sidetrack and it will continue on as such.
A tangent is a sidetrack.
I accept your refusal to discuss the veracity of the twitter feed as an admission your only purpose is now to sidetrack and go off on tangents that don't have anything to do with actual issues or facts relevant to the Michael Brown shooting.
Consistently devoid of any valid original content or thought. It's just an emotional rant because you don't like Shaun King's narrative, yet you don't seem to have an issue with the rightwing rag? You've really devolved into a political hack. You have as much credibility as WC or Che or m>s. Seriously man, you've turned into a really ty poster tbh.
Maybe go back to the gun stuff. At least you had some tactical knowledge about the subject you were attempting to discuss. You're just ting your pants in this thread and the most embarrassing aspect is that you seem to be completely oblivious to the huge ing grunt steaming in your shorts.
I won't be fishing you tonight Rumpy.
You never do.
No big deal.
You just post some stupid nicknames and run.
FuzzyLumpkins has been posting "facts" that have already been proven untrue. I am on a tangent FOR facts concerning the case. Any bull will be called out as such.
You have yet to call any bull regarding the twitter feed.
See above post, you are completely off base as usual.
You've yet to call bull on fuzzylumpkins.
I usually don't read his posts.
Why are you trying to rubber/glue everyone now? That would only be relevant if your actions were totally dependent on the actions and of others and their perceptions of you.
It's pretty much why I am comfortable just reposting the take each new page after he spams. There is no point in arguing with stupid.
how did he get the distance in the third picture from the first 2?
You can use the pictures to look for landmarks to judge the locations and thus distance on a separate map. He claims to have actually walked it in Ferguson but you can do it yourself using google maps.
what landmarks are used? anybody can say "i walked there and used landmarks" and draw arbitrary points on a bigger map
Trees, buildings, sidewalks, driveways, etc. You can look at all the photos they ahve of the body and at the truck and place them. If you disagree with a location they used then by all means point it out.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
