Reply With Quote
Oh. Can you tell me why exactly this is the case?
You may as well have cited a 4chan post.
Oh. Can you tell me why exactly this is the case?
Just look at the ads in that article...Look at the founder/owner of that "paper".... I don't take it seriously.
Not saying the Washington Times is right but even the National Enquirer publishes a legitimate scoop every now and then.
http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/...0R22C120150902A review last month by Reuters of previously released Clinton emails found 30 email threads that the State Department has marked to show they include information shared in confidence by foreign government officials, from prime ministers to spy chiefs.
U.S. government regulations examined by Reuters say this sort of information, whether written or spoken, must be classified from the start, and handled through secure, government-controlled channels.
The Clinton-Mitc correspondence is one of 57 email threads found by Reuters in the latest batch of emails released on Monday that the State Department has marked as including the same type of information.
In all the 87 email threads examined by Reuters, the State Department has blanked out the confidential information in the public copies, adding the classification code "1.4(B)", denoting foreign government information.
This is the only kind of information that presidential executive orders say is "presumed" to likely harm national security if wrongly disclosed. State Department regulations describe it as the "most important category of national security information" its officials encounter.
If the State Department's markings are correct, it appears that Clinton and her senior staff routinely did not follow the regulations in the department's Foreign Affairs Manual, which tells employees they "must" safeguard foreign government information by treating it as classified.
"It's hard to square the secretary's conduct with the strict letter of the FAM," Steven Aftergood, the director of the Federation of American Scientists' government secrecy project, said in an email.
State department came out 2 weeks ago saying that some of it was or should have been classified. I was certain at that time this had to have legs. The longer this goes on and no one ins utionally does anything to censure her the more I come to doubt anything will come of it.
Repugs probably been shopping for a judge since the moment they created this scandalous outrage.
btw, if Hillary is the nominee, the recent silence on BENGHAZI! will come roaring back. Confederate Gowdy has "classified" Congressional testimony until later.
Is shllary still breathing?
has been in hiding waiting for this to blown over.
We'll see. Her IT guy pleading the fizzif sure doesn't help.
he knows he will be subpoenaed in the Repug witch hunt.
was it classified when it was in Hillary's email?
There's huge controversy of what should be classified, with the reflex to OVERclassify.
head Cheney retroactively classified Ms of docs that had been in the public domain for decades, just because he could (gratuitously exercise power and say " all y'all", I'm the President)
did Hillary send or receive the so-called classified email?
convenient that this "huge" controversy is only being heard about now
nope, if you were informed as the brilliant Great Boutons, you'd know federal doc classification is has been an ongoing controversy for many years.convenient that this "huge" controversy is only being heard about now
I love it when people who don't read or watch any news complain about something not being covered in the news.
She erred in judgement big time again. First when she under estimated Barack Obama and now she's feeling the Bern again.
big time? how about BIG BIG BIG amplification by Repugs/Fox?
why hasn't Fox gone after other top officials, including Repugs, with private mail servers and destruction of Ms of WH emails?
Fox has cried fox so many times, serious people know they are lying.
I'm surprised Boo even cares about Hillary. I for sure thought he would be a Bernie supporter since Karl Marx can't run.
now she says shes sorry. After months of joking about it, ignoring it, ducking it, surprising by it, dissapointed bh it. Niw the is sorry!!!! Holy r we in trouble if she gets anywhere near the White house
I don't GAF about Hillary beyond being a better Pres than any of your Repug Klowns.
I do GAF about Repugs and FOX and right wing hate machine duping you mofos and all the old white men losers, bubbas, rednecks, Christian Taliban with lies and propaganda and witch hunting.
she should have shut up until the analysis was done.
still think we should move along, Officer Barbrady?
She simply does not come across as genuine. She is very qualified for the POTUS but today people vote for people they "like" and right now the GOP really likes Trump and Carson.
I believe Gov. Kasich is going to be a formidable candidate in the very near future. He isn't far right at all but if the GOP wants to truly win he is a very strong option, IMHO.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
