Reply With Quote
No you're not.
There is no "antiwar wing" -- there are only Trump supporters. The only thing Trump has to do to keep their votes is to be on the ballot.
Yeah right they'd vote for him if he fellated Kim at home plate of Yankee Stadium on Live TV because at least he didn't lick his ass like Hillary would have
No you're not.
There is no "antiwar wing" -- there are only Trump supporters. The only thing Trump has to do to keep their votes is to be on the ballot.
Everyone’s day comes. He looked like Sadam Hussein being hauled out of his hole. Night night
Assange offered to help Manning crack a US Department of Defense password.
That is not journalism.
Your predictions have worked out so well recently
MA niga Corbyn
Called Dat
Me I called it
Me
He shouldn't have offered to hack the DoD.
That was pretty ing stupid.
Chelsea kept the receipts
You might want to tell the NYT and WaPo that receiving classified, password-protected information could be indictable, they won Pulitzer Prizes off the info Assange/Snowden gave them. They also have secure, anonymized info drops, is that not encouraging people to crack passwords?
https://www.weeklystandard.com/jack-...american-media
shhh Pavlov thinks Assange is the only journalist in history that has cracked a password
Read this again:
Assange offered to help Manning crack a US Department of Defense password.
That is not journalism.
If you have examples of journalists working for WaPo or the NYT offering to hack DoD passwords for a person stealing that information, post them right now. I would love to read all about them.
If you have examples of journalists working for WaPo or the NYT offering to hack DoD passwords for a person stealing that information, post them right now. I would love to read all about them.shhh Pavlov thinks Assange is the only journalist in history that has cracked a password
Let's see 'em.
It's not spying either. Maybe it is indictable as a computer crime.
I'm inclined to agree with what hater said. This is mainly about showing up Wikileaks for showing up the USG as corrupt and lying, which touches the core mission of journalism: holding power accountable for what it does.
I didn't say that. Read my statement again.
on the Manning case, Assange did not offer. Manning asked if he could hack passwords and he said yes. There was no discussing as to what that password was going to be used for.
and LOL thinking US would go to these lenghts to punish a password hack attempt (unsucsessful on top)
they would charge assange with jaywalking if it meant getting their hands on him. they obviously want to punish him for leaking US dirty underwear
Assange is a s bag. Full stop
Wikileaks may have started out as a haven for whistleblower but they are certainly not that anymore. Basically a hack station for hire these days.
Do I think Assange is sleazy? Yes.
Do I think Wikileaks itself became a racket at some point, yep.
Hackers can and do serve the public. Assange had his moment, it certainly seems to have impressed the USA enough to extradite Assange for an offense that did the USA no harm.
Helping a Federal criminal to steal secret govt info is Federal criminal complicity.
And yes, US gov certainly seeks revenge for being embarrassed, humiliated before its allies, its enemies, and the world for not being able to keep its butt cheeks together.
Maybe you should read the indictment.
I've not read it, what does it say?
He is charged with a computer related crime.
Thanks!
Snowden should start investigating those suspect deaths of journalists since he's in mother Russia then. Let's see how exposing putin works out for him.
Just sayin..
you can access the indictment here
https://www.justice.gov/usao-edva/pr...e/file/1153481
1 count for conspiracy to commit computer intrustion
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
