Reply With Quote
Answer it or half-ass answer like you?
I gave a possible answer for the latest one.
Wouldn't even require a law.
Can you not see the possibility in this case?
Please answer.
Answer it or half-ass answer like you?
I am now demanding from Chucho and DMC transcripts of the calls the Odessa shooter made to the police and FBI as well as the cal the shooter's work made to the police since they say for sure it would have made no difference whatsoever and all those people
I say they might have.
Answer it.
Show me how it's done.
<Crickets>I could imagine without you telling me "better communication".
Quantify it. How would you know you have better communication?
When called out you always resort to your shtick. You're a fraud
You'd know you have better communication when the officer pulling over the guy who called both the police and the FBI knows the guy he pulled over called the police and the FBI.
Pretty simple stuff.
Goalpostmove.gif
So you're not going to answer my question?
OK.
Never expected you to.
It's ok, you didnt answer the question originally asked to you. Didnt expect you to, either. When in rome.So you're not going to answer my question?
OK.
Never expected you to.
But, hey, derp's here for you. You two have endless pages of back and forth quuering to get to
Sure I did. That's my possible answer for this last shooting.
You didn't want to discuss this at all. You guys get super defensive whenever this is brought up. Just like ducks tbh.Didnt expect you to, either. When in rome.
So, your solution is don't be incompetent. Groundbreaking stuff, Chump.
How are you saying anyone was incompetent in this case?
What rules or protocols were not followed and by whom?
I'm willing to discuss it if any of you are.
Doesn't look like it.
Resorting to narrative building
You didnt answer the question that was asked. Period. Stick to your fandango with derp.
No, I'd rather discuss this shooting with you.Resorting to narrative building
You didnt answer the question that was asked. Period. Stick to your fandango with derp.
Do you not see the possibility that better communication could've helped in this case?
Please answer this time.
You're saying that there was a breakdown in communication. Or are you saying they were fully competent instead? Pick a lane, Chump.
Resorting?Resorting to narrative building
You didnt answer the question that was asked. Period. Stick to your fandango with derp.
That's his main play.
I'm saying there was probably no policy in place requiring that communication.
Do you know all their policies?
Tell me all about them.
You're speculating that the police and FBI had insufficient policies.
I don't know the exact nature of the call, but let's assume threats were made, directly or indirectly, then it's up for law enforcement to assess the threat level and act accordingly, no?
Yes. They certainly may have.
Took you awhile, but you go it.
I don't even think a threat assessment was necessary. The officer who pulled him over probably would've treated the situation differently had he known of the phone calls.
Pretty simple.
What? He'd have to be a threat to be treated differently. You're just bad at this.
Well, I can't argue with stupid.
I can't understand for you, so it's not a big deal.
No need to go any further with you.
You just said that the cops wouldn't treat a threat any differently than a non-threat.
They wouldn't necessary have to see him as a bona fide threat. Just a potential threat to himself or others after making those calls.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
