Reply With Quote
just btw, birthright citizenship has been an explicit English common law right since the 1600s
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Calvin%27s_Case
Mike Jonson and JD Vance are talking about emending the cons ution by statute
Trump 2.0 is the most extreme, radical anti-American any of us have seen in our lives -- the 14th Amendment isn't a loophole, it's been settled, foundational law for 160 years
https://newrepublic.com/article/2127...gop-fox-admits
just btw, birthright citizenship has been an explicit English common law right since the 1600s
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Calvin%27s_Case
not grandfathered, though
Calvin's Case did not extend English subject status to the antenati (Scots born prior to 1603). They remained aliens in relation to England, on the theory that King James had not yet become the king of England at the time of their birth.[11] Attempts had been made in the English Parliament, prior to Calvin's Case, to naturalise all of James's Scottish subjects—both those born after his English accession in 1603 (the postnati) and also those born before 1603 (the antenati)—but these legislative efforts had been unsuccessful.[12] Concerns had been expressed that extending the privileges of English subjects to all Scots would cause England to be flooded by "an influx of 'hungry Scots'".[13] Objections were also raised that granting naturalisation to all the Scots would have encouraged the legal philosophy, espoused by James, of absolute monarchy and the divine right of kings.[14] Even after Calvin's Case, the English Parliament could have enacted a naturalisation bill covering the antenati, but it never did so.
I expect to see new state and congressional challenges to 14A, but it appears Trump has given up
https://www.politico.com/news/2026/0...ling-rehearingUnder Supreme Court rules, a rehearing pe ion must be filed within 25 days of the challenged decision, which came down on June 30. That period would have ended Monday, since such deadlines don’t expire on weekends.
However, there is no indication of such a filing on the Supreme Court’s docket for the case.
Spokespeople for the White House and Justice Department did not respond to repeated requests for comment
Trump is still trying to amend the 14th Amendment by proclamation
Impeach, remove and prosecute
https://www.whitehouse.gov/president...n-citizenship/
Trying to can the US Cons ution is a high crime
Supine toadies in Congress not defending the cons ution and their own express powers therein should be impeached and removed as well
14A gives Congress the power to enforce it
Last edited by Winehole23; 08-06-2026 at 08:14 PM.
"Sure we lost that SCOTUS case. What this executive order proposes is, what if we pretend we didn't."
Systematic violation of the foundational do ent is a war on the USA, a subversion of the form of government and any subsequent transfer of power should reflect that
from Lincoln's 2nd inaugural, as displayed at the Lincoln memorial
storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...Fed. judge preliminarily blocks Trump's latest birthright citizenship EO, in which he purported to restrict who is a U.S. citizen when born in U.S. after SCOTUS rejected previous EO.
"No Presidential Executive Order can undo what the Supreme Court has done."
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
