There's nothing wrong with his shot.
The bottom line is, we have more pressing needs than bringing Jax back...a true SF for one & we need a center also...like leemajors said...Jax is neither of those...doesn't matter how you slice it,the Spurs are not going to commit that much money(Manu & Jax= $14 mil a year) to the SG spot...I would rather take a chance on JR Smith & maybe Macijauskas for Barry, than commit that much to Jax...having Finley at the backup SG/SF spot is good enough for me.
Since when is SJax not a "true PF"?
I assume you mean SF right? he's been a SG since he came into the league.
TD is a power forward, Oberto is a power forward, Bonner is a power forward...Jax is not a power forward..he is a shooting guard.
Ya, I meant SF.
He's not a shooting guard though, even though that's where we played him. He can do everything a SG does except...he can't dribble. That's pretty important. Watching him stumble with the ball is painful. =(
Jax has been a guard ever since he came into the league..if he ever played the SF spot, he would be playing out of position
Jax's profile
In my opinion, he is better suited for the SF position.
In fact, in my opinion...the only reason he didn't here is because Bowen's SF spot was sacred at the time.
To me, Stephen Jackson is like a lot of a players in the league -- he's a "wing". I don't know why there's such a big deal of the semantics of shooting guard or small forward. In the Spurs system, he could play either spot.
That being said, there's not really a place for him here -- he won't get playing time unless the Spurs are dealing Manu, Bowen or Finley.
If we didnt' have Fins, he would fit in minutes wise...but with Finley it's tough.
no kidding
but spurs have to get youth so mb thinks spurs need him
because he wears a headband
The long 3 they've been missing since,
uh.
well,
Stephen Jackson.
He'll be our starting center.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
