I've seen those videos about the WTC, the pentagon and all that. The one about the Pentagon really shook me up. I'm sure everyone has seen it. The things that got me were; where was the plane wreckage, why was the building damage kept to a minimum if a 7?7 hit it at full speed, and where were the bodies of the passengers. Who knows what happened. It's all fascinating, but I know our government wasn't completely in the dark on this one.
Whats wrong with your lazy ass that you don't have time to download this movie and then you tell us all what part you don't understand?
http://video.google.com/videosearch?...e=UTF-8&tab=wv
I'm not asking what low production value Google Video thinks, bag.
I'm asking you what you think.
I think your full of . you happy now?
bag.?
And to think I thought you was one to lecture others on name calling. There are some weak minded posters in this forum that, we don't need to show proof we see it on a daily basis.
It does not matter what the topic is. You and your pocket protector buddies just want to argue, If we talk about Jesus? you will say "Show me proof. where is the manger located?" If we talk about winning money in Vegas , you will say show me the bank receipt that shows you really have money you won, You guys just want to disagree with anyone who shows any sign of Intelligent debate.
But being that your a simple minded Spurs fan your excused since you all feel Manu does not flop and Bowen never plays dirty.
Last edited by =RTM=; 02-07-2007 at 03:56 AM.
Why are you so cowardly that you can't bring yourself say what you think?
I ask you guys a direct question and I get nothing.
You are pathetic.
BTW I saw your precious video.
Then I saw another Google video that blew it out of the water in 1/5 of the time.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...74150347523777
Once again, what do YOU think?
You're a dumb, burnt out, ing re .
I know the damage to the Pentagon was kept to a minimum because unlike, say, the WTC, the Pentagon is built like a freaking bunker out of thick stone, while an airplane is built out of lightweight aluminum.
Stone wins in a fight with aluminum. The body of that plane wouldn't have made it very deep before disintegrating, and the wings wouldn't have penetrated much, if at all.
The planes are made to expand and contract.
Didn't Randy Johnson throw a pitch that disintegrated a pidgeon?
Yes, and an object with a hard rubber core wrapped in leather is much harder than a soft-tissue organism with a lightweight endoskeleton.
Here's an experiment:
1. Roll up a ball of aluminum foil as big around as your hand. Go outside and drop it on a boulder. Observe what happens to the boulder.
2. Lay the foil ball on the ground. Pick up the boulder and drop it on the ball of foil. Observe the effect on the foil.
i agree about the stone vs aluminum scenario, but the damage was pretty far into the pentagon. plus, it's pretty safe to assume that the wings would snap off immediately upon impact with stone. where were they? i didn't see anything that resembled wreckage on the outside. the fuel tank would've burned inside the pentagon, so i don't believe the disinegration theory on that one.
I can't help you there, ES. Some here would say I only have enough foil for my head.
Not that they care, but this thread has given me a new found respect for clambake and chumpdumper.
Hilarious.
Fuel tanks are in the wings. What do you think happened to the wings NOW?
I love the "it's pretty safe to assume" thing.
How about this one, "it's pretty safe to assume" that two planes were hijacked and flown into the WTC causing mass destruction. "It's pretty safe to assume" that a plane was hijacked at around the same time and flown into the Pentagon. "It's pretty safe to assume" that another plane was hijacked and the passengers fought to take the plane back before it crashed into a field into Pennsylvania.
Hey, look at that, I just solved the "mystery" by assuming things.
^^
The plane was flying pretty fast. That is a lot of kinetic energy to dissipate. If the plane had not so quickly disintegrated, the damage to the Pentagon would have been much worse.
If there had been signs of semi-intact wings, that would raise eyebrows to me about what really happened. I would expect at most tiny, confetti-size shreds of metal, and a lot of aluminum oxide residue.
You would expect as the wings snapped off, they would curl in towards the fuselage and follow the body of the plane into the building as they disintegrated.
The fuel tanks on the Boeing 757 are on the wings.
I get the feeling that most of the conspiracy theorists were liberal arts majors.
Now that's just flat out wrong ES. Everyone that's ever seen cartoons knows for a fact that when a plane runs into something, the wings snap off immediately and just lay there completely intact.
Afterwards, hilarity always ensues when the cartoon character flying the plane drifts for a little while before falling off the cliff and gets flattened. Then of course the wings hit him in the top of the head causing him to fold like an accordian.
I love the Road Runner too.
Hey, who knew that coffee will burn one's sinuses?
what do you think happened to the wings?
I also learned from cartoons that when something or somebody goes through a wall, they punch a hole with their exact silhouette.
They were shredded into small pieces by the impact, and most of the pieces burned.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
