OK, so if you put the entire city of Phoenix in a time machine and send them back 35 years, we'll ALL be ing happy. They'll have a ghost of a chance, and we'll be rid of them.
We're bored. Let us pick on this little head for a while.
OK, so if you put the entire city of Phoenix in a time machine and send them back 35 years, we'll ALL be ing happy. They'll have a ghost of a chance, and we'll be rid of them.
It did that the minute you typed in it.
This will not scare me for a while and Oden will be a part of the biggest thug team there is and Durant is going to a team that hasn't really scared anybody in a long while. They win their division one year, and are terrible the next with the same team. Until they prove otherwise, they are no threat, the Jazz are the only real threat to join the 3 elite teams anytime soon.
I agree with that. A defensive philosophy goes a long way. Even the incredible offensive Laker/Celtic teams of the 80s were top 5 in the defensive categories. You need to be balanced on both ends of the floor to win a le.
But in the defense of the guy who originally said it, the Colts never won until they stepped up on defense. I thought the Suns could possibly overcome, but maybe they need to take a look at the Colts model of this past season.
Don't even need to go back thirty-five years, just check out the Showtime Lakers. Right now Phoenix's biggest problem is its head coach and backup point guard.
2006-07 Spurs
2nd in FG%
4th in Opponents' FG%
![]()
The Lakers played ing defense. They ran, but they played damn good defense, which isn't a surprise with Riles as their coach. They also had a half court offense with a post game.
We need to play better defense sure, but there doesn't have to be a fundamental change in our system or team concept.
So who's the best? Dallas?
They had the worst run defense in the NFL last year, but whatever.
You need an effective half court offense that won't wilt in the playoffs when someone decides to make Nash score. Setting multiple picks and movement without the ball would be a start.
Not without defense.
Most of the modern-day fastbreak concepts came from Auerbach's Celtics. But didn't win squat until they got a guy named Bill Russell.
Yes, but go look at what their run defense became in the playoffs. Far from the worst when it mattered.
IN THE REGULAR SEASON
But in the PLAYOFFS when it really MATTERED they stepped up their defense, not allowing a touchdown to KC or Baltimore.
-Mars
If the Suns are the Rams, then of course the Spurs are the Patriots. Why settle for being at best a one-trick pony? Why not become a conventional team with all that talent and win normally?
Because now there are Suns fans in here who can actually complete a thought?
We can do that just fine. Our half court offense without Nash, while it isn't our strong suit, isn't what is keeping us from getting over the hump. The problem is when Nash goes out, we can't execute anything. And against San Antonio, Nash had 12 assists per game, so outside of the first game you guys didn't really force him to be the scorer.
At this point, I'd take one championship over the squadoosh we have now.
I agree completely, just pointing out that although tough and unlikely, it is possible.
I think the Suns players, other than Nash and Bell, are just generally too stupid to put in something effective like a motion offense. Can you imagine Amare having to set two picks on the same play, and pass the ball, and then not even score? He'd be charging the coaching box. The Blur would be much less effective, too. He's generally not comfortable in a slower offense: witness the WCSF when San Antonio put lead boots on PHO.
But the Rams still have a better O-line than the Suns, and even though Nash is a better scrambler, Bulger's got the arm. I can't figure out how the Suns could possibly improve on that front and still manage to pay their expensive WRs.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)