Brett Kavanaugh now under FBI investigation

[DarrinS]

So much for Ms Ramirez

[DarrinS]

The vote is Friday morning. What a mockery.

Why even show up to testify when they're not even listening? What a joke. Team red!

I don’t think she’ll show up

[RandomGuy]

No. What matters is there is no evidence to deny Brett Kavanaugh a supreme court seat based on what she is saying. My hypothesizing about motive is just that. I don't have any evidence of that, either. So don't try her for perjury (after she testifies).

Believe him he is a Republican, don't believe her. Don't have the FBI investigate, because she is a liberal, therefore lying, because she wants fame/money.

Got it.

[boutons_deux]

committee vote Friday

[Pavlov]

i openly support anything that makes you pull out the last remaining hairs on that bald ass head of yours.

What you said about hating activist judges was complete bull . Thanks for confirming.

[DarrinS]

Still waiting on his mystery accuser.

[koriwhat]

What you said about hating activist judges was complete bull . Thanks for confirming.

you got me all wrong pav. i hate the judges you support! lmao! anything you support i will vehemently ing hate!

[Pavlov]

Still waiting on his mystery accuser.

Until then you're taking mystery 4chan poster's word for it.

[DarrinS]

Until then you're taking mystery 4chan poster's word for it.

Never did. Misrepresenting other people, per par.

[Reck]

Still waiting on his mystery accuser.

He said in 48 hours. Can you count? It's barely been 24 hours since he set that 48 timetable.

Not that it matters anyways because the Republicans dont want to hear from the first woman, let along a third.

[Pavlov]

you got me all wrong pav. i hate the judges you support! lmao! anything you support i will vehemently ing hate!

obsessed with me. That's what you should base your political beliefs upon.

[Pavlov]

Never did. Misrepresenting other people, per par.

Do you believe mystery 4chan poster?

Yes or no.

[RandomGuy]

My point was specifically that the left believes (quite possibly rightly), that Kavanaugh on the court means the end of Roe V. Wade. As a member of the left, we can assume Dr. Ford believes this. Therefore, when I was asked why someone would put herself through what she is putting herself through, I said, "to save Roe vs Wade" (not in so many words).

The liberal professors are my best friends, btw. I get drunk and debate people a LOT smarter than me all the time.

Doesn't mean she is lying, does it?

She kept silent, because the consequences of her silence were little. He lives his life, and she doen'st have to pay the tremendous cost of losing her professional and personal life.

Now the stakes of keeping silent are vastly higher. Her personal calculus changed. The cost of keeping silent are vastly greater to her than the cost of speaking up.

The only difference is your starting assumption.

I assume women generally tell the truth.

You assume women generally lie, or at least this woman is lying, even though you have no evidence she is lying. That about sum it up?

smh

[RandomGuy]

Never did. Misrepresenting other people, per par.

It would be a lot easier to not do so, were you to make some clarification of what you actually think, other than doorbell ringing some "own the libs" bull , and running the away like a .

Given how often your gets destroyed, I can see why you choose the latter so often, tbh.

[pgardn]

you got me all wrong pav. i hate the judges you support! lmao! anything you support i will vehemently ing hate!

If he makes you that mad...
Thats a problem.
You base your political thoughts totally on someone else?

Pavs did not support the Iraq war so you did? I don’t think so. Not with the hindsight you both have. I’m talking little Bush and his disaster.

[boutons_deux]

Ari Melber Calls Out Male GOP Senate Judiciary Cowards For Dodging Questioning Christine Ford

Ari Melber explained how Republicans on the Senate Judiciary Committee look bad by hiring a female prosecutor to do their dirty work for them in questioning Christine Blasey Ford.

“This though obviously doesn’t look like that kind of case where someone with a long-term subject matter interest,

like the official counsel for the committee, is dealing with topics.

My job is to report to you the news, but when it looks bad,

I have to tell you that it looks bad.

This looks bad because it does look, unlike the Watergate precedent,

more like a method for the male senators

to avoid catching heat, political pressure, criticism

for the way that they might push the accuser,

an issue that of course came up in the 1991 hearings when Anita Hill testified.”

https://www.politicususa.com/2018/09...iticus+USA+%29

So the misogynist Repugs have hired female PROSECUTOR to prosecute Ford as defendant rather than as plaintiff,

because Repugs are so respectfully, reliably pro-women.

Will Repugs males speak at all?

[DarrinS]

Do you believe mystery 4chan poster?

Yes or no.

I’d love for that rumor to be true, but I highly doubt it.

[DarrinS]

It would be a lot easier to not do so, were you to make some clarification of what you actually think, other than doorbell ringing some "own the libs" bull , and running the away like a .

Given how often your gets destroyed, I can see why you choose the latter so often, tbh.

Alrighty then

[DarrinS]

So, in a criminal trial, you have evidence beyond a reasonable doubt.

Civil trial, you have preponderance of evidence, a slightly lower standard.


So, what do we have in this case? And, I realize that this process is not a trial. Would like to know what spurraider thinks.

[Pavlov]

So, in a criminal trial, you have evidence beyond a reasonable doubt.

Civil trial, you have preponderance of evidence, a slightly lower standard.


So, what do we have in this case? And, I realize that this process is not a trial. Would like to know what spurraider thinks.

This is a job application. More precisely a job promotion process.

[Pavlov]

Grown white men are going to be hiding behind the skirt of their "assistant" Thursday.

[DarrinS]

Grown white men are going to be hiding behind the skirt of their "assistant" Thursday.

white men, the dregs of society

[Pavlov]

white men, the dregs of society

Why are the Republican senators not questioning Ford themselves, Darrin?

Explain.

[DarrinS]

This is a job application. More precisely a job promotion process.

Well, since SCOTUS is the highest court, it would naturally be a promotion for any nominee.

If you’re going to present evidence that the nominee is unfit, what is the standard? What if someone claimed Kagan killed puppies when she was a HS student? But, the person couldn’t say when or where and had no corroborating witnesses?

[DarrinS]

Why are the Republican senators not questioning Ford themselves, Darrin?

Explain.

Optics