Reply With Quote
Reported by anyone else?
Yep, you're the real victim here, Nathan.
Reported by anyone else?
right..
Tune into your favorite Network CNN. Ramirez's lawyer will be on there next.
If i was Ford, I wouldn't testify given that they have already decided not to listen to it.
I never said it did lead to the female vote.
Have you ever had sex?
Women can be quite amorous and absolutely want the act to occur. It’s a healthy zesty endeavor for both people, pure joy that can even lead to a wanted child known as “we are trying to have children” But THEY get penetrated. And on occasion, it really hurts I have been told. So stop, maybe remedy the situation with whatever and go at it again. If it’s still painful, why not stop. As a male, it’s a huge turnoff for me if your wife or whomever is not fully engaged. I want to be told what feels good.
Do you need more guidance? I will talk to your daughters if you would like. You can be there. I can go over my instructions ahead of time with you.
Well, the public could listen. Oh well.
Not on FB.
Sounds like you need to tackle "toxic femininity". You can go one of the following approaches:
1. Needlessly talk about "toxic femininity" as if that does anything.
2. Actually tackle the problem by encouraging women to talk and instilling confidence within them.
Crazy thing is option 1 is not only ineffective but actually hinders the solution. Because telling someone they are toxic doesn't quite instill confidence. That's pretty much how that bull works in practice. So stop comparing it to the change of opinion on slavery. That's ing moronic.
bragged about boofing, FFFFFFouth of July and Renate Alumnius on his HS yearbook page, but didn't get any until he married at age 35.
I get that that's the right thing to say with your wife right
there...
So I need to tackle toxic femininity because I am cognizant of my partner’s pleasure. And if my partner is not having a pleasurable time like I am, and I get turned off, then I have become the victim of toxic femininity... Cool.
You have not have good sex. I feel sorry for you.
The slacery thing. If we had grown up as slave owners children during that time it would make perfect sense that we might see blacks as a commodity, property, our workers that we own and possibly trade. But, if we read the Bible, considered shaves people, we might actually question the whole thing. But maybe not.
But you find this totally divorced from any other social movement? You don’t think we could have been Nazis growing up in Nazi Germany? You don’t think we could have treated women as property with one purpose, to have children, if we grew up in a certain religious environment?
Well... I’m not that good. I’m shaped by a cultural environment around me. Some of it I find ridiculous, some of it I find reasonable and fitting my value system shaped by so many factors. But you... You are immune to this BS.
we have a political procedure devoid of due process and judicial standards of proof. That's as designed. There used to be normative deference to the executive and professional qualifications.. .once upon a time, about 25 years ago.
in b4 damn libs ruin everything
He didn't say he didn't have any till he was married.
asshole K has probably never had a serious crisis as he glided through life a chosen, groomed one
White House Fears Kavanaugh Could Crack During Senate Testimony After He Looked 'Shaken' During Fox News Interview:
even as Kavanaugh's defenders strike a confident pose, they are far from certain about his prospects at being approved by the Senate.
The report notes that after a Fox News interview of Kavanaugh and his wife Ashley Estes Kavanaugh aired Monday night, there were mixed reactions in the White House:
After the interview aired, the sense in the West Wing was relief that Kavanaugh was able to present an image to counter the allegations.On CNN Tuesday night, New York Times reporter Maggie Haberman likewise reported that
Yet there remained concern among aides, and
Trump himself, as to how Kavanaugh, who appeared shaken at times during the interview,
would hold up facing far fiercer questioning from Senate Democrats on Thursday, according to a White House official
Trump and others were not thrilled with Kavanaugh's performance in the interview.
During the interview,
Kavanaugh was repe ive and looked startled.
He repeatedly said he was looking for a "fair process" and
that he just wanted to be "heard,"
even though his Republican allies have had a stranglehold over the entire process and
no one has denied him the ability to respond to his accusers.
He denied the accusations against him in their entirety, but
he also made several dubious claims that threw more doubt on his credibility.
https://www.alternet.org/news-amp-po...fter-he-looked
I wish Franken was on that committee. He had the most balls, tolerated no nonsense.
that's what I just said
Look at this....blah blah blah...over yep ~~~nothing..
Hannity: 1991 Joe Biden Tape Destroys Dems' Calls for FBI Probe of Kavanaugh
http://insider.foxnews.com/2018/09/2...n-hannity-says
Hannity: 1991 Joe Biden Tape Destroys Dems' Calls for FBI Probe of Kavanaugh
Fox News Insider
Sean Hannity said that many Democrats believe an FBI probe of Judge Brett Kavanaugh is the only way he can prove his innocence against claims of sexual harassment.
But, Hannity pointed out that one of the party elders made the exact opposite argument in a very forceful manner in 1991.
Then-Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Joe Biden (D-Del.), who was presiding over the Clarence Thomas hearings, called for everyone to stop invoking the FBI in that manner.
"The next person who refers to an FBI report as being worth anything, obviously doesn’t understand anything. FBI explicitly does not, in this or any other case, reach a conclusion, period. Period," Biden said.
My Democrat friends might want to consider this from then-Judiciary Committee Chairman JOE BIDEN (D-DE) In 1991: The ‘FBI Explicitly Does Not, In This Or Any Other Case Reach A Conclusion, Period’
— Leader McConnell (@SenateMajLdr) 4:49 PM - Sep 25, 2018
"[W]hen people wave an FBI report before you, understand they do not, they do not reach conclusions," he continued.
'He's a Buffoon': Tucker Reacts to Michael Avenatti Claiming New Kavanaugh Accuser
Hume on Female Interrogator: Dems 'Want to See a Bunch of Old White Guys' Questioning Kavanaugh Accuser
Read Full Article
Hannity said that in light of the unearthing of the Biden tape, it is clear that Democrats have rejected their own past reasoning in addition to the American standard of "due process [and] presumption of innocence."
A successor to Biden's seat, current Sen. Chris Coons (D-Del.) echoed the exact opposite of the demand for due process and presumption of innocence, Hannity said.
"[Kavanaugh] bears the burden of disproving these allegations," Coons said.
"Democrats want a cheap political victory," Hannity said. "Even if that means throwing 'inalienable rights' right out the window."
He reminded viewers of another Democrat on the committee, Hawaii Sen. Mazie Hirono, who demanded last week that men "shut up" when it comes to accusations against other men.
"[Female accusers] need to be believed," she said.
Democrats were against FBI reports before they were for them? @JoeBiden https://www.youtube.com/watch?featur...Wo&app=desktop …
— Ed Henry (@edhenry) 3:09 PM - Sep 25, 2018
'Michael Is Now Making Disaster Movies': Gutfeld Riffs on Moore's Latest 'Flop'
The Five: The Left's Rejection of Due Process Means Everyone Must Buy 'Accusation Insurance'
From 1991. Things have changed. Biden himself would admit he was a POS in those days
If it was garland the left would not want a fbi investigation saying 6 was enough
Yes. And?
who is it?
yep, is huge stain on his career.
Biden reveals Anita Hill hearing regret
https://www.msn.com/en-us/video/lifestyle/biden-reveals-anita-hill-hearing-regret/vp-AAArVdz
Debra Katz, Christine Ford´s attorney.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
