Frederick Douglass on Slavery & the US Cons ution

[Pavlov]

welp

So she actually didn't say anything about reparations.

[Winehole23]

Gullible Chris never reads past the lede and isn't beneath misreading it -- even though we can all read it too!

[Spurminator]

It seems like Ilovemyfreedom.org is a test site to gather information from the dumbest partisans in existence.

They consistently contradict their own stories in their headlines, and yet somehow they still get shared by lazy basement virgins like Qhris, who have so little dignity that they think nothing of sharing articles from a site called Ilovemyfreedom.org.

[Spurtacular]

So why didn't they just establish the US as a slave free nation in the first place?

Are you under the impression that the Cons ution would have been ratified if slavery were to be abolished right off?

[Pavlov]

Are you under the impression that the Cons ution would have been ratified if slavery were to be abolished right off?

Thanks for proving my point from nine years ago, derp.

[Spurtacular]

Thanks for proving my point from nine years ago, derp.

Are you under the impression that the Cons ution would have been ratified if slavery were to be abolished right off?

[Pavlov]

Are you under the impression that the Cons ution would have been ratified if slavery were to be abolished right off?

Thanks again nine years ago.

[DMC]

It seems like Ilovemyfreedom.org is a test site to gather information from the dumbest partisans in existence.

They consistently contradict their own stories in their headlines, and yet somehow they still get shared by lazy basement virgins like Qhris, who have so little dignity that they think nothing of sharing articles from a site called Ilovemyfreedom.org.

Who in SA has basements?

Basements aren't that bad, I've seen some really tricked out basements with pool tables and wetbars. I'd dwell there.

[Spurtacular]

Thanks again nine years ago.

Are you under the impression that the Cons ution would have been ratified if slavery were to be abolished right off?

If you're afraid of a straight-forward question, just say so.

[Winehole23]

Are you under the impression that the Cons ution would have been ratified if slavery were to be abolished right off?

If you're afraid of a straight-forward question, just say so.

You constantly demand answers, but never answer any.

If you're afraid to read through the thread to get a flavor of the conversation, just say so.

[Spurtacular]

You constantly demand answers, but never answer any.

If you're afraid to read through the thread to get a flavor of the conversation, just say so.

Thanks for the chime-in, chump's fluffer. Now let's watch as chump refuses to answer the simplest of questions which was generated based upon his own original input and directly related to the OP.

[Pavlov]

Are you under the impression that the Cons ution would have been ratified if slavery were to be abolished right off?

No.

That was my whole point in posting that rhetorical question.

Nine years ago.

Anyone who isn't an idiot could get the point.

The United States was founded as a slave country.

Any other questions?

[Spurtacular]

No.

That was my whole point in posting that rhetorical question.

Nine years ago.

Anyone who isn't an idiot could get the point.

The United States was founded as a slave country.

Any other questions?

"Founded as a slave country" is not even an ambivalent answer.

Are you under the impression that the Cons ution would have been ratified if slavery were to be abolished right off?

Yes or no.

[Pavlov]

"Founded as a slave country" is not even an ambivalent answer.

Are you under the impression that the Cons ution would have been ratified if slavery were to be abolished right off?

Yes or no.

Jesus Christ you dumbass.

Read the very first word in the above response.

What is that word?

You ing quoted it.

[Spurtacular]

Jesus Christ you dumbass.

Read the very first word in the above response.

What is that word?

You ing quoted it.

Lashing out.

So, basically you were making a nothing point in the first place. You were not making a real counter to the OP; you were casting aspersions. Par.

[Pavlov]

Lashing out.

So, basically you were making a nothing point in the first place. You were not making a real counter to the OP; you were casting aspersions. Par.

No.

Nine years ago Galileo made the stupid assertion that the Founding Fathers uniformly didn't want slavery.

I asked him a question he couldn't answer because it destroyed his stupid assertion.

You should be very familiar with not answering simple questions because you're getting destroyed.

Par.

lol.

Derp.

going back nine years to fail to understand an argument someone else had.

[Spurtacular]

No.

Nine years ago Galileo made the stupid assertion that the Founding Fathers uniformly didn't want slavery.

I asked him a question he couldn't answer because it destroyed his stupid assertion.

You should be very familiar with not answering simple questions because you're getting destroyed.

Par.

lol.

Derp.

going back nine years to fail to understand an argument someone else had.

"uniformly" is your spin. Nay, he made the point that the Cons ution was an inspired do ent that was ultimately there to support all races in time. What is your objection to that? You don't seem to have one that isn't now made up.

[Pavlov]

"uniformly" is your spin. Nay, he made the point that the Cons ution was an inspired do ent that was ultimately there to support all races in time. What is your objection to that? You don't seem to have one that isn't now made up.

How could it support all the races at the time when one race was enslaved and that slavery was enshrined in the do ent?

Explain.

[Spurtacular]

How could it support all the races at the time when one race was enslaved and that slavery was enshrined in the do ent?

Explain.

"in time"

I guess that modifier just went right over your head.

[Pavlov]

"in time"

I guess that modifier just went right over your head.

"in time"

Why is slavery enshrined in the Cons ution?

[Spurtacular]

"in time"

Why is slavery enshrined in the Cons ution?

Chump begging for a civics lesson.

So, is your contention that the Cons ution is currently racist?

[Pavlov]

Chump begging for a civics lesson.

Sorry. I asked you a question:

Why is slavery enshrined in the Cons ution?

If you're not going to answer it, just say so.

[Spurtacular]

Sorry. I asked you a question:

Why is slavery enshrined in the Cons ution?

If you're not going to answer it, just say so.

The Cons ution originally conceded the South's right to slaves.

So, is your contention that the Cons ution is now currently racist?

[Pavlov]

The Cons ution originally conceded the South's right to slaves.

So, is your contention that the Cons ution is now currently racist?

No. That is your strawman.

The Cons uiton has been amended.

[Blake]

"in time"

I guess that modifier just went right over your head.

Lol what a stupid modifier.

Goddam you're an idiot